Cited by 15Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchXenotransplantation and immune response

Construction of a Biocompatible Decellularized Porcine Hepatic Lobe for Liver Bioengineering

Hussein, Kamal H., Park, Kyung M., Kim, Hyun M., Teotia, Pankaj K., Ghim, Jinn H., Woo, Heung M.·2015·The International Journal of Artificial Organs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: One of the major obstacles in applying decellularized organs for clinical use is the recellularization step, during which huge numbers of cells are required to develop whole livers. We established a simple protocol for constructing a bioartificial hepatic lobe and investigated its biocompatibility. METHODS: The right lateral lobe of porcine liver was decellularized using 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate through the right branch of the portal vein. Decellularized lobes were evaluated by histological and biochemical analyses. DNA content was quantified to validate the decellularization protocol. The presence of immunogenic and pathogenic antigens was checked to exclude potential rejection and thrombosis after xenotransplantation. Xeno-reactivity of decellularized tissue against human peripheral blood mononuclear cells was examined. Cytotoxicity was evaluated against hepatocarcinoma cells. Finally, scaffolds were incubated in collagenase for biodegradation testing. RESULTS: The decellularized lobe preserved the three-dimensional architecture, ultrastructure, extracellular matrix components, and vasculature. Scaffolds were almost depleted of DNA in addition to antigenic and pathogenic antigens, which are considered barriers to xenotransplantation. The human immune response against scaffolds was considered non-significant. Our matrices were biocompatible and biodegradable. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully developed a non-cytotoxic, non-immunogenic, and biodegradable porcine hepatic lobe for future liver regeneration and bioengineering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5301/ijao.5000394

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hussein, K. H., Park, K. M., Kim, H. M., Teotia, P. K., Ghim, J. H., & Woo, H. M.
Affiliations
  • Kangwon National University (KR)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Woo, Heung M.
Venue
The International Journal of Artificial Organs
Published
2015-01-03
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
96-104
ISSN
  • 0391-3988 (ISSN-L)
  • 1724-6040
OpenAlex
W2000165518
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Artificial Organs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Xenotransplantation and immune response
Keywords
porcine liver, xenotransplantation, biocompatibility, immunogenicity, extracellular matrix, liver regeneration, cytotoxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Extracellular Matrix, Graft Rejection, Graft Survival, Humans, Liver, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate, Time Factors, Transplantation, Heterologous, Liver Transplantation, Collagenases, Liver, Artificial, Transplantation Tolerance, Tissue Engineering, Sus scrofa, Tissue Scaffolds, Hep G2 Cells, Heterografts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review