Update on Cannulation Techniques
Abstract
There are two methods of fistula cannulation for hemodialysis. The first, different site or rope-ladder cannulation method, established by originators of the arteriovenous fistula as a blood access for hemodialysis in 1966, relies on changing the puncture sites for each dialysis. The second, constant site or buttonhole method, developed several years later, recommends using the same puncture sites for consecutive dialyses. The first method is prevailing at present, but the second method is becoming more and more popular. The major advantage of this buttonhole method is lower cannulation pain, fewer fistula complications, with the exception of fistula infection, which is more common in some studies. This method is more difficult and requires experienced single cannulator to establish good puncture sites. Home hemodialysis patients using single cannulator, the patient or helper, have better results with this method. Busy dialysis centers with high rotation of cannulators do not have as good results and prefer the rope-ladder method.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Historically, the constant site needle insertion technique gained acceptance by word of mouth from patients' positive cannulation experiences.
“Historically, the constant site needle insertion technique gained acceptance by word of mouth from patients’ positive cannulation experiences [36].”
From Improving vascular access outcomes: attributes of arteriovenous fistula cannulation success (2016) · cites this paper as [36]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improving vascular access outcomes: attributes of arteriovenous fistula cannulation success
Harwood, L. E., Wilson, B. M., & Oudshoorn, A. (2016) · Clinical Kidney Journal · doi:10.1093/ckj/sfv158 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Twardowski, Z. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Twardowski, Zbylut J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Vascular Access
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 9_suppl
- Pages
- S54-S60
- ISSN
- 1129-7298 (ISSN-L)
- 1724-6032
- OpenAlex
- W2043110900
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Vascular Access (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vascular Procedures and Complications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Keywords
- arteriovenous fistula cannulation, hemodialysis vascular access, buttonhole cannulation, cannulation pain, fistula infection, home hemodialysis
- MeSH terms
- Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical, Catheterization, Equipment Design, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Needles, Punctures, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review