The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reviving and reclaiming our native food system: leadership experiences of a research project’s community advisory board.
Open accessAbstract
As proud Native community leaders who call the Wind River Reservation home, our battles for sovereignty and respect are not just part of a long-ago history. Claiming our self-empowerment and putting it to good use on behalf of our entire community are challenged more often than we care to recount. In the matter of sustainable food security, those of us who agreed to serve as members of the Growing Resilience Community Advisory Board (CAB) were reminded of such events. Our CAB was established in 2016 as an oversight group for community wellbeing for a University of Wyoming (UW)–initiated and National Institutes of Health (NIH)–funded research project on gardening and health. See the press release for this article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Restoration of bison on tribal lands can, under appropriate vision and planning, support reclamation of traditional food systems by providing a sustainable protein source to communities with some of the greatest food insecurity in the United States (Bowers et al., 2019;Feeding America, 2019).”
From The Potential of Bison Restoration as an Ecological Approach to Future Tribal Food Sovereignty on the Northern Great Plains (2022) · cites this paper as Bowers et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shamon, H., Cosby, O. G., Andersen, C. L., Augare, H., BearCub Stiffarm, J., Bresnan, C. E., Brock, B. L., Carlson, E., Deichmann, J. L., Epps, A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.826282 · Cited by 56
Growing Intergenerational Resilience for Indigenous Food Sovereignty through Home Gardening
Budowle, R., Arthur, M., & Porter, C. (2019) · Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development · doi:10.5304/jafscd.2019.09b.018 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowers, R., Harris, P., Harris, C., Lone Fight, K., Weed, I., & White, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development
- Published
- 2019-10-15
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 2152-0798 (ISSN-L)
- 2152-0801
- OpenAlex
- W2980930297
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
- Keywords
- community advisory board, community leadership, sustainable food security, Indigenous self-determination, community well-being, Wind River Reservation, Indigenous food systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
