The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Septuagint and Samareitikon
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A reading from the Samareitikon, a Greek translation of the SP or a Samaritan Targum (Joosten 2015), also has 782 as the ry for Methuselah (Wevers 1974b, p. 106).”
From The case for the Septuagint’s chronology in Genesis 5 and 11 (2018) · cites this paper as Joosten 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The case for the Septuagint’s chronology in Genesis 5 and 11
Smith, H. (2018) · The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism · doi:10.15385/jpicc.2018.8.1.14
“A reading from the Samareitikon, a Greek translation of the SP or a Samaritan Targum (Joosten 2015), also has 782 as the ry for Methuselah (Wevers 1974b, p.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Joosten, J.
- Corresponding author
- Joosten, Jan
- ORCID
- Joosten, Jan
- Venue
- From Author to Copyist
- Publisher
- Penn State University Press
- Published
- 2015-11-06
- Pages
- 1-16
- OpenAlex
- W4382134064
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 9.76
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Penn State University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Byzantine Studies and History
- Keywords
- Septuagint, Samaritan Pentateuch, Samaritan texts, Samaritan language, Hebrew Bible translation, Samaritanism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
