Mud-Bricks as a dating tool in Egyptian archaeology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Within Egyptian Dynastic history the addition of a stamp on mudbricks began during the reign of Nebpehtire Ahmose.
“Furthermore, within Egyptian Dynastic history the addition of a stamp on mudbricks began during the reign of Nebpehtire Ahmose [111,139,140].”
From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as [139]
These sizes are strikingly similar to the mudbricks used about 300 years earlier by Senusert III at Abydos.
“These sizes are strikingly similar to the mudbricks used about 300 years earlier by Senusert III, also at Abydos.”
From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as [139]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 1
- Authors
- Yamamoto, K., & Creasman, P. P.
- Venue
- An Excellent Fortress for His Armies, a Refuge for the People”
- Publisher
- Penn State University Press
- Published
- 2020-07-10
- Pages
- 392-406
- OpenAlex
- W4410847768
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Penn State University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
- Keywords
- adobe, dating, chronology, Egyptian archaeology, ceramic dating, stratigraphy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
