The Dark Inside the Prologue: Enactive Cognition and Eerie Ontology in Catherynne M. Valente's Radiance
Open accessAbstract
Twenty-first-century fiction continues to examine the ontological instabilities of postmodernism. But even as they hold on to the idea of multiple realities, these works also aim to change the tone with which that idea is represented. This article analyzes Catherynne M. Valente's Radiance (2015), a novel which thematizes the unstable ontologies that Brian McHale describes through the metaphor of flickering. By adding embodied and communicative dimensions to the postmodernist imaginary, Valente's novel rethinks what the metaphor of flickering could mean and what effects ontological groundlessness can have on readers. The article connects these literary phenomena to the theories of enactive cognition, and suggests that enactive theory, just like Valente's reinterpretation of postmodern flickering, provides a sense of the world having strange agency as well as lacking proper solidity. Thus contemplating our perception of reality is eerie in the sense proposed by Mark Fisher, a term that provides a new grip on the experience of unstable ontology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The shape of the world inhabited by a subject is likely to impact on the subject's cognition, and therefore on their understanding of the world itself.
“This claim shows once more that the shape of the world inhabited by a subject is likely to impact on the subjects' cognition, and therefore on their understanding of the world itself.”
From Interactive Digital Narratives as Complex Expressive Means (2022) · cites this paper as Polvinen, 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interactive Digital Narratives as Complex Expressive Means
Bellini, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2022.854960 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“However, enactivism also supports the idea that the subject and the world are in a dynamic relationship of mutual shaping: “the world is inseparable from the subject, but from a subject who is nothing but a project of the world; and the subject is inseparable from the world, but from a world that it itself projects” (…”
BackgroundInfluentialArchival Earth: Endangered Testimony at the Limits of Narrative
Krieg, C. (2022) · Partial Answers · doi:10.1353/pan.2022.0019 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Polvinen
- Venue
- Style
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 385
- ISSN
- 0039-4238 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3199260675
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Style (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
- Keywords
- radiance, enactive cognition, flickering, Brian McHale, Mark Fisher, ontology, postmodernism, agency, embodiment, perception of reality, speculative fiction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review