Breed Susceptibility for Developmental Orthopedic Diseases in Dogs
Abstract
A large-scale epidemiological study was conducted to determine breeds at risk for 12 developmental orthopedic diseases (DODs). Developmental orthopedic diseases investigated included canine hip dysplasia (CHD); craniomandibular osteopathy (CMO); fragmented coronoid process; hypertrophic osteodystrophy; Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease; osteochondrosis of the medial humeral condyle, caudal humeral head, femoral condyles, and talar trochlear ridges; panosteitis; patella luxation; and ununited anconeal process. Dogs that were diagnosed with any one of the diseases of interest at any of 10 veterinary teaching hospitals participating in the Veterinary Medical Database from 1986 to 1995 were included as cases. Odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated to determine risk. Frequency of diagnosis during the 10-year period ranged from 35 cases (CMO) to 10,637 cases (CHD). The number of breeds at increased risk for a disease ranged from one (CMO) to 35 (CHD). Breed susceptibility for a DOD may suggest a genetic component in the disease etiology. The results of this study serve to increase veterinarians’ awareness of breeds susceptible to DODs and may facilitate the control of such diseases by identifying breeds that might benefit from breeding programs or environmental intervention such as dietary modification.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inbreeding increases hereditary pathology and conformational disorders, such as orthopaedic and joint disorders, skin disease, aural disease, ocular disease, or breathing difficulties like brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome.
“And in many cases, this also increases hereditary pathology and conformational disorders, such us orthopaedic and joint disorders [26,184,185]; skin disease [26]; aural disease [186]; ocular disease [121,187]; or even breathing difficulties, like the sadly famous brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome (BOAS) [121,188,189].”
From Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding (2024) · cites this paper as [185]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 267
- Authors
- LaFond, E., Breur, G. J., & Austin, C. C.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association
- Publisher
- American Animal Hospital Association
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 467-477
- ISSN
- 0587-2871 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-3317
- OpenAlex
- W2160639616
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Keywords
- developmental orthopedic disease, dogs, breed susceptibility, canine hip dysplasia, hypertrophic osteodystrophy, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, osteochondrosis, ununited anconeal process, genetic susceptibility, disease risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bone Diseases, Developmental, Breeding, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Hip Dysplasia, Canine, Indiana, Male, Records, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Odds Ratio, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review