Cited by 61Vocational Education and TrainingVocational and Entrepreneurial EducationEducation and Technology Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of Technology Integration in the Teaching-Learning Process in Selected Career and Technical Education Programs

Redmann, Donna, Kotrlik, Joe·2004·Journal of Vocational Education Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5328/jver29.1.3

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. P. George, 2000, Breaking ranks., Principal Leadership, 1, 56
  2. Rader, M., & Wilhelm, W. (2001). Needed research in business education (6th ed.). Little Rock, AR: Delta Pi Epsilon.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 61

Metadata

Authors
Redmann, D., & Kotrlik, J.
Venue
Journal of Vocational Education Research
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
3-25
ISSN
0739-3369 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984047435
Cited by
61
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Vocational Education Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational Education and Training
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
Keywords
technology integration, teaching-learning process, vocational education, educational technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review