The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility
Open accessAbstract
MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) are the educational buzzword of 2012. Media frenzy surrounds them and commercial interests have moved in. Sober analysis is overwhelmed by apocalyptic predictions that ignore the history of earlier educational technology fads. The paper describes the short history of MOOCs and sets them in the wider context of the evolution of educational technology and open/distance learning. While the hype about MOOCs presaging a revolution in higher education has focussed on their scale, the real revolution is that universities with scarcity at the heart of their business models are embracing openness. We explore the paradoxes that permeate the MOOCs movement and explode some myths enlisted in its support. The competition inherent in the gadarene rush to offer MOOCs will create a sea change by obliging participating institutions to revisit their missions and focus on teaching quality and students as never before. It could also create a welcome deflationary trend in the costs of higher education. Explanatory Note During my time as a Fellow at the Korea National Open University (KNOU) in September 2012 media and web coverage of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) was intense. Since one of the requirements of the fellowship was a research paper, exploring the phenomenon of MOOCs seemed an appropriate topic. This essay had to be submitted to KNOU on 25 September 2012 but the MOOCs story is still evolving rapidly. I shall continue to follow it. 'What is new is not true, and what is true is not new'. Hans Eysenck on Freudianism This paper is published by JIME following its first release as a paper produced as part of a fellowship at the Korea National Open University (KNOU). Both the original and this republication are available non-exclusively under Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY). Apart from this note and minor editorial adjustments the paper is unchanged. Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538 · Cited by 852
A research framework of smart education
Zhu, Z.-T., Yu, M.-H., & Riezebos, P. (2016) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2 · Cited by 782
MOOCs and the funnel of participation
Clow, D. (2013) · Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge · doi:10.1145/2460296.2460332 · Cited by 567
Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Education
Ahmad, S. F., Rahmat, M. K., Mubarik, M. S., Alam, M. M., & Hyder, S. I. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132212902 · Cited by 336
Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Doo, M. Y. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09747-8 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Daniel, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Interactive Media in Education
- Publisher
- Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
- Published
- 2012-12-13
- Volume
- 2012
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 18
- ISSN
- 1365-893X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119902448
- Cited by
- 1,148
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 221.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5334/2012-18
- The paper
- Daniel, J. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. https://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.