Cited by 48Health and Medical EducationInnovations in Medical EducationGlobal Health and Surgery

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Experiential Learning and Mentorship in Global Health Leadership Programs: Capturing Lessons from Across the Globe

Open access

Abstract

Objectives: The changing global landscape of disease and public health crises, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, call for a new generation of global health leaders. As global health leadership programs evolve, many have incorporated experiential learning and mentoring (ELM) components into their structure. However, there has been incomplete consideration on how ELM activities are deployed, what challenges they face and how programs adapt to meet those challenges. This paper builds on the co-authors' experiences as trainees, trainers, organizers and evaluators of six global health leadership programs to reflect on lessons learned regarding ELM. We also consider ethics, technology, gender, age and framing that influence how ELM activities are developed and implemented. Findings: Despite the diverse origins and funding of these programs, all six are focused on training participants from low- and middle-income countries drawing on a diversity of professions. Each program uses mixed didactic approaches, practice-based placements, competency and skills-driven curricula, and mentorship via various modalities. Main metrics for success include development of trainee networks, acquisition of skills and formation of relationships; programs that included research training had specific research metrics as well. Common challenges the programs face include ensuring clarity of expectations of all participants and mentors; maintaining connection among trainees; meeting the needs of trainee cohorts with different skill sets and starting points; and ensuring trainee cohorts capture age, gender and other forms of diversity. Conclusions: ELM activities for global health leadership are proving even more critical now as the importance of effective individual leaders in responding to crises becomes evident. Future efforts for ELM in global health leadership should emphasize local adaptation and sustainability. Practice-based learning and established mentoring relationships provide the building blocks for competent leaders to navigate complex dynamics with the flexibility and conscientiousness needed to improve the health of global populations. Key Takeaways: Experiential learning and mentorship activities within global health leadership programs provide the hands-on practice and support that the next generation of global health leaders need to address the health challenges of our times.Six global health leadership programs with experiential learning and mentorship components are showcased to highlight differences and similarities in their approaches and capture a broad picture of achievements that can help inform future programs.Emphasis on inter-professional training, mixed-learning approaches and mentorship modalities were common across programs. Both individual capacity building and development of trainees' professional networks were seen as critical, reflecting the value of inter-personal connections for long-term leadership success.During program design, future programs should recognize the "frame" within which the program will be incorporated and intentionally address diversity-in all its forms-during recruitment as well as consider North-South ethics, leadership roles, hierarchies and transition plans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/aogh.3194

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leadership development systematically equips high-potential employees with the essential skills, competencies, and experiences needed to step into leadership roles.

    “Leadership development is focused on systematically equipping high-potential employees with the essential skills, competencies, and experiences needed to step into leadership roles.”

    From Ensuring leadership continuity: An integrative review of succession planning, leadership development and organisational memory (2025) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Introduction and Abstract (Findings; pages not available) describe global health leadership programs that develop trainees’ skills and competencies through practical experience and mentorship. The paper does not characterize leadership development generally as systematically equipping high-potential employees; its focus is trainees from varied professions and backgrounds. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 2020, Beyond the science: Advancing the “art and craft” of implementation in the training and practice of global health, Int J Health Policy Manag
  2. 2019, Global health mentoring toolkits: A scoping review relevant for low- and middle-income country institutions, Am J Trop Med Hyg, 100, 48, 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0563 · DOI
  3. 2019, The future of leadership development: Gaps in traditional executive education are creating room for approaches that are more tailored and democratic, Harvard business review, 97, 40
  4. 2005, Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education, Academy of Management learning & education, 4, 193, 10.5465/amle.2005.17268566 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 1984, Experience as the source of learning and development
  6. 2009, From experience to experiential learning: cultural intelligence as a learning capability for global leader development, Academy of Management learning & education, 8, 511
  7. 2008, Change and its Leadership Change Leadership that Works: The Role of Positive Psychology, Organisations & People, 15
  8. 2014, Why leadership development isn’t developing leaders, Harvard Business Review
  9. 2019, Learn from people, not classes: Whom do you know, and what can they teach you?, Harvard business review, 97, 11
  10. 2020, Developing a high-impact learning program for global health professionals: The STAR project, Pedagogy in health promotion, 6, 23, 10.1177/2373379919898484 · DOI
  11. 2019, Strengthening mentoring in low- and middle-income countries to advance global health research: An overview, Am J Trop Med Hyg, 100, 3, 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0556 · DOI
  12. 2013, Mentorship in African health research training programs: an exploratory study of fogarty international center programs in Kenya and Uganda, Education for Health, 26, 183, 10.4103/1357-6283.126001 · DOI
  13. 2019, Evaluating academic mentorship programs in low- and middle-income country institutions: Proposed framework and metrics, Am J Trop Med Hyg, 100, 36, 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0561 · DOI
  14. 2019, Kuskaya: a training program for collaboration and innovation in global health, J Multidiscip Healthc, 12, 31
  15. 1997, ROPES: An experiential learning activity for leadership skills, Nurse educator, 22, 48, 10.1097/00006223-199711000-00018 · DOI
  16. 2017, The Afya Bora fellowship: An innovative program focused on creating an interprofessional network of leaders in global health, Acad Med, 92, 1269, 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001856 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rodríguez, D. C., Jessani, N. S., Zunt, J., Ardila-Gómez, S., Muwanguzi, P. A., Atanga, S. N., Sunguya, B., Farquhar, C., & Nasuuna, E.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Makerere University (UG)
  • University of Buea (CM)
  • Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (TZ)
  • Infectious Diseases Institute (UG)
Corresponding author
Rodríguez, Daniela C.
Venue
Annals of Global Health
Published
2021-07-12
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
61
ISSN
2214-9996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3179825662
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Annals of Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fogarty International Center (D43TW010132, D43TW009345)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
Keywords
experiential learning, mentoring, global health leadership, leadership training, low- and middle-income countries, interprofessional education, hands-on learning, capacity building, program planning and evaluation, program sustainability, COVID-19 pandemic, public health crisis, research training
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Clinical Competence, Developing Countries, Education, Medical, Graduate, Humans, International Cooperation, Leadership, Global Health, Program Development, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review