Cited by 4Family Support in IllnessNursing care and researchFamily and Disability Support Research

Tailored Psychoeducational Home Interventions for Children with a Chronic Illness: Families’ Experiences

Open access
Capurso, Michele, Catalano, Gaetano, Calvaruso, Anna, Monticelli, Annalinda, Taormina, Calogero, Battiato, Samanta, Guadagna, Francesca Paola, Piccione, Tania +4 more·2024·Continuity in Education

Abstract

The quality of life for a child with a chronic illness depends on various factors, including the illness’s severity, medical treatments, psychosocial and educational support, resource availability, and community involvement. These biopsychosocial factors become significant when the child receives care at home. This article presents and evaluates a highly personalized support project offered to 40 Sicilian families, consisting of educational, social, and psychological services delivered at the families homes and in their communities. Guided by the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) and the Functional Psychology framework, the project employed a family-focused approach to healthcare and was based on a continuous dialogue between all stakeholders. The project was evaluated through a qualitative interview with eight families in the Palermo area, which was analyzed using consensual qualitative research. Results revealed families’ appreciation of the project and the importance of a professional who listened to their needs, provided a connection with the medical team, and tailored activities inside and outside the home. The ability of professionals to listen and adapt activities to different contexts and needs was crucial for the project’s success. We conclude that creating tailored family-level interventions with an educator acting as a liaison with the medical team is a widely acceptable strategy that should be further developed and investigated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/cie.100

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Close dyadic teacher-student bonds fostered resilience in medicalized environments.

    “In line with attachment‐oriented perspectives, these bonds fostered resilience in medicalized environments [62, 63].”

    From Sense of School Belonging and School Reintegration for Students Hospitalized With Chronic or Complex Medical Diseases: Insights From a Grounded Theory Study (2026) · cites this paper as [62]

    Results (Domain I) describes a child’s close relationship with home-care professionals, and the Conclusion says psychoeducational services can promote resilience at home. The paper does not establish that dyadic teacher–student bonds fostered resilience in medicalized environments; its focus is on children and families receiving home-based interventions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [1]Adams, S. C., Smith-Turchyn, J., Santa Mina, D., Neil-Sztramko, S., Cormie, P., Culos-Reed, S. N., Campbell, K. L., Pugh, G., Langelier, D., Schmitz, K. H., Phipps, D. J., Nadler, M., & Sabiston, C. M. (2021). The exercise oncology knowledge mobilization initiative: An international modified delphi study [Original research]. Frontiers in Oncology, 11. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.713199 PMC8327176 34350125 · DOI
  2. [2]Askins, M. A., & Moore, B. D. (2008). Psychosocial support of the pediatric cancer patient: Lessons learned over the past 50 years. Current Oncology Reports, 10(6), 469– 476. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-008-0072-1 18928661 · DOI
  3. [3]Barlow, J. H., & Ellard, D. R. (2004). Psycho-educational interventions for children with chronic disease, parents and siblings: An overview of the research evidence base. Child: Care, Health and Development, 30(6), 637– 645. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00474.x 15527474 · DOI
  4. [4]Capurso, M., Dell’antonia, F., Berizzi, G., & Manfredi, G. (2021). Teachers’ perception of the functional and problematic aspects of home schooling for sick pupils. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica, 16(1), 37– 57. DOI: 10.6092/issn.1970-2221/11843 · DOI
  5. [5]Collins, A., Burchell, J., Remedios, C., & Thomas, K. (2020). Describing the psychosocial profile and unmet support needs of parents caring for a child with a life-limiting condition: A cross-sectional study of caregiver-reported outcomes. Palliative Medicine, 34(3), 358– 366. DOI: 10.1177/0269216319892825 32103697 · DOI
  6. [7]Cousineau, T. M., Hobbs, L. M., & Arthur, K. C. (2019). The role of compassion and mindfulness in building parental resilience when caring for children with chronic conditions: A conceptual model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1602. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01602 31428005 PMC6690403 · DOI
  7. [9]Epstein, R. M., & Street, R. L. (2011). The values and value of patient-centered care. The Annals of Family Medicine, 9(2), 100– 103. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1239 21403134 PMC3056855 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [10]Galligan, M. M., & Hogan, A. K. (2021). The Goldilocks problem: Healthcare delivery models for children with medical complexity. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 51(12), 101– 127. DOI: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2021.101127 35000837 · DOI
  9. [11]Gianturco, G. (2020). L’intervista qualitativa. Nuova edizione [The qualitative interview. New edition]. goWare e Edizioni Angelo Guerini e Associati.
  10. [13]Giorgio, A. (2015). Motherhood and work in Italy: A socio-cultural perspective. Journal of Romance Studies, 15(3), 1– 21. DOI: 10.3167/jrs.2015.150301 · DOI
  11. [14]Gordon, T., & Burch, N. (2003). Teacher effectiveness training: the program proven to help teachers bring out the best in students of all ages (1st rev. ed.). Three Rivers Press.
  12. [15]Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., Hess, S. A., Knox, S., Williams, E. N., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update [Review]. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196– 205. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [16]Howlader, N., Noone, A., Krapcho, M., Miller, D., Brest, A., Yu, M., Ruhl, J., Tatalovich, Z., Mariotto, A., & Lewis, D. (2021). SEER cancer statistics review, 1975– 2018. National Cancer Institute.
  14. [17]Hung, Y. L., & Chen, J. Y. (2008). Exploration of social support available to mothers of children with cancer, their health status, and other factors related to their family function. Journal of Nursing, 55(6), 47– 57. 19051174
  15. [18]Jibb, L. A., Chartrand, J., Masama, T., & Johnston, D. L. (2021). Home-based pediatric cancer care: Perspectives and improvement suggestions from children, family caregivers, and clinicians. JCO Oncology Practice, 17(6), e827– e839. DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00958 33914620 · DOI
  16. [19]Kazak, A. E. (2006). Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM): Research, practice, and collaboration in pediatric family systems medicine. Families, Systems, & Health, 24, 381– 395. DOI: 10.1037/1091-7527.24.4.381 · DOI
  17. [20]Kazak, A. E., & Noll, R. B. (2015). The integration of psychology in pediatric oncology research and practice: Collaboration to improve care and outcomes for children and families. American Psychologist, 70, 146– 158. DOI: 10.1037/a0035695 25730721 · DOI
  18. [22]Marchetti, F., Bonati, M., Marfisi, R. M., La Gamba, G., Biasini, G. C., & Tognoni, G. (1995). Parental and primary care physicians’ views on the management of chronic diseases: a study in Italy. The Italian Collaborative Group on Paediatric Chronic Diseases. Acta Paediatrica, 84(10), 1165– 1172. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13518.x 8563230 · DOI
  19. [24]Mitchell, A. E., Morawska, A., & Mihelic, M. (2020). A systematic review of parenting interventions for child chronic health conditions. Journal of Child Health Care, 24(4), 603– 628. DOI: 10.1177/1367493519882850 31630533 · DOI
  20. [25]Mitchell, A. E., Morawska, A., Vickers-Jones, R., & Bruce, K. (2021). A systematic review of parenting interventions to support siblings of children with a chronic health condition [Review]. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 24(3), 651– 667. DOI: 10.1007/s10567-021-00357-1 34184174 · DOI
  21. [26]Nap-Van Der Vlist, M. M., Kars, M. C., Berkelbach Van Der Sprenkel, E. E., Nijhof, L. N., Grootenhuis, M. A., Van Geelen, S. M., Van Der Ent, C. K., Swart, J. F., Van Royen-Kerkhof, A., Van Grotel, M., Van De Putte, E. M., & Nijhof, S. L. (2020). Daily life participation in childhood chronic disease: A qualitative study. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 105(5), 463– 469. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318062 31748222 · DOI
  22. [27]National Research Council. (2011). Health care comes home: The human factors. National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/13149 · DOI
  23. [28]Ospina, P. A., McComb, A., Pritchard-Wiart, L. E., Eisenstat, D. D., & McNeely, M. L. (2021). Physical therapy interventions, other than general physical exercise interventions, in children and adolescents before, during and following treatment for cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8(8), Cd012924. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012924.pub2 34343340 PMC8407387 · DOI
  24. [29]Pai, A. L. H., Patiño-Fernández, A. M., McSherry, M., Beele, D., Alderfer, M. A., Reilly, A. T., Hwang, W.-T., & Kazak, A. E. (2007). The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0): Psychometric properties of a screener for psychosocial distress in families of children newly diagnosed with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33(1), 50– 62. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm053 17609228 PMC2819976 · DOI
  25. [30]Pieterse, A. L., Evans, S. A., Risner-Butner, A., Collins, N. M., & Mason, L. B. (2009). Multicultural competence and social justice training in counseling psychology and counselor education: A review and analysis of a sample of multicultural course syllabi [Review]. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(1), 93– 115. DOI: 10.1177/0011000008319986 · DOI
  26. [31]Price, R. A., Stranges, E., & Elixhauser, A. (2012). Statistical Brief #132 Pediatric Cancer Hospitalizations, 2009, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK98448/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK98448.pdf 22787680
  27. [33]Rocco, D., Rizzi, L., Dell’Arciprete, G., & Perrella, R. (2022). The functional psychotherapy approach: A process-outcome multiple case study [Original research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727497 PMC8777224 35069311 · DOI
  28. [34]Saffer, J., Nolte, L., & Duffy, S. (2018). Living on a knife edge: The responses of people with physical health conditions to changes in disability benefits. Disability & Society, 33(10), 1555– 1578. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2018.1514292 · DOI
  29. [35]Schmitz, K. H. (2020). Exercise oncology: The past and present. In K. H. Schmitz (Ed.), Exercise oncology: Prescribing physical activity before and after a cancer diagnosis (pp. 1– 10). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42011-6_1 · DOI
  30. [37]Van Schoors, M., De Mol, J., Morren, H., Verhofstadt, L. L., Goubert, L., & Van Parys, H. (2018). Parents’ perspectives of changes within the family functioning after a pediatric cancer diagnosis: A multi family member interview analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 28(8), 1229– 1241. DOI: 10.1177/1049732317753587 29357749 · DOI
  31. [38]Watson, G., Coyne, Z., Houlihan, E., & Leonard, G. (2022). Exercise oncology: An emerging discipline in the cancer care continuum. Postgraduate Medicine, 134(1), 26– 36. DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2021.2009683 34854802 · DOI
  32. [39]Yang, J., Lin, L., Gao, Y., Wang, W., & Yuan, L. (2022). Interventions and strategies to improve social support for caregivers of children with chronic diseases: An umbrella review [Review]. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 973012. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.973012 36213907 PMC9537372 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capurso, M., Catalano, G., Calvaruso, A., Monticelli, A., Taormina, C., Battiato, S., Guadagna, F. P., Piccione, T., D’Angelo, P., Russo, D., Trizzino, A., & Raspa, V.
Affiliations
University of Perugia (IT)
Corresponding author
Capurso, Michele
Venue
Continuity in Education
Published
2024-01-05
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
1-21
ISSN
2631-9179 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390615035
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Continuity in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
children with chronic illness, family-focused care, family experiences, Psychosocial Assessment Tool, home-based intervention, quality of life, biopsychosocial factors, Sicily

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review