Cited by 7Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceChild Welfare and Adoption

Exploring Acceptability and Feasibility of Evidence-Based Practice in Child Welfare Settings: A Pilot Study with Attachment-Based Family Therapy

Open access
Santens, Tara, Levy, Suzanne A., Diamond, Guy S., Braet, Caroline, Vyvey, Mildred, Heylboeck, Elisabeth, Bosmans, Guy·2017·Psychologica Belgica

Abstract

The Flemish Child Welfare System (CWS) is in great need of a shared empirically informed clinical strategy for working with depressed adolescents and their families. Many evidence-based practices (EBP) exist, but little is known as to whether they can be successfully imported in the CWS. Therefore, the current study explores the implementation of a particular EBP, Attachment-Based Family Therapy (ABFT), in home-based services of the Flemish CWS in Belgium. Specifically, the study focused on (1) the acceptability of ABFT by counselors and whether negative attitudes about EBP can be changed (n = 73 counselors), and (2) the feasibility of implementing ABFT (n = 43 adolescents, 11–17 years old, 72% female) by exploring initial effectiveness. The results suggest that (1) initial negative attitudes of counselors towards ABFT were significantly more positive after attending training and discussions about ABFT, and that (2) ABFT could be used by counselors to successfully reduce adolescent depressive symptoms. Future research should include a control group to draw stronger causal conclusions. Strengths and limitations of the study’s design and implications for further dissemination are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/pb.338

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple studies have shown high acceptability and feasibility of ABFT for both adolescents and emerging adults.

    “Multiple studies have shown high acceptability and feasibility of ABFT for both adolescents and emerging adults [20, 24–27].”

    From The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of attachment-based family therapy for young adults with high suicidal ideation: protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Discussion reports a pilot study of ABFT implementation in child welfare services, and the Results report improved counselor attitudes on four of nine acceptability items after a workshop. This provides limited support for acceptability and feasibility with adolescents, but not for broadly high acceptability, multiple studies, or emerging adults: the study’s participants were aged 11–17 (Method; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 7

Authors
Santens, T., Levy, S. A., Diamond, G. S., Braet, C., Vyvey, M., Heylboeck, E., & Bosmans, G.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Bosmans, Guy
Venue
Psychologica Belgica
Published
2017-04-12
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
43-58
ISSN
  • 0033-2879 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-670X
OpenAlex
W2591888415
Cited by
7
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychologica Belgica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Psychologica Belgica (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
attachment-based family therapy, evidence-based practice, child welfare, adolescent depression, counselor attitudes, implementation feasibility, home-based services, dissemination of evidence-based interventions, family therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review