The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Reply to "What is Public Archaeology?"
Abstract
The modelling of archaeological ‘commodities’ and the call for an economics of them can offer a very useful perspective on the subject of public archaeology. While the exact nature of what constitutes archaeological commodities is inevitably open to debate the idea of them allows a consideration of exactly what archaeology produces, the valuation of it, and the mechanisms of this production and consumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“If the remit and value of public archaeology are to provide a method of understanding the public demand for Moshenska ' s archaeological ' commodities ' -be these archaeological artefacts and sites, archaeological experiences or archaeological knowledge -then public archaeology has to provide data for the archaeological ' industry ' on public consumption of archaeological information (Burtenshaw 2”
From Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics (2015) · cites this paper as Burtenshaw 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics
Richardson, L.-J., & Almansa-Sánchez, J. (2015) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438243.2015.1017599 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Burtenshaw, P.
- Venue
- Present Pasts
- Publisher
- Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
- Published
- 2010-01-08
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1759-2941
- DOI
- 10.5334/pp.8
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Reply to "What is Public Archaeology?". https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5334/pp.8
- The paper
- Burtenshaw, P. (2010). A Reply to "What is Public Archaeology?". Present Pasts. https://doi.org/10.5334/pp.8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
