Emerging roles and responsibilities of libraries in support of reproducible research
Open accessAbstract
Ensuring the reproducibility of research is a multi-stakeholder effort that comes with challenges and opportunities for individual researchers and research communities, librarians, publishers, funders and service providers. These emerge at various steps of the research process, and, in particular, at the publication stage. Previous work by Knowledge Exchange highlighted that, while there is growing awareness among researchers, reproducible publication practices have been slow to change. Importantly, research reproducibility has not yet reached institutional agendas: this work seeks to highlight the rationale for libraries to initiate and/or step up their engagement with this topic, which we argue is well aligned with their core values and strategic priorities. We draw on secondary analysis of data gathered by Knowledge Exchange, focusing on the literature identified as well as interviews held with librarians. We extend this through further investigation of the literature and by integrating the findings of discussions held at the 2022 LIBER conference, to provide an updated picture of how libraries engage with research reproducibility. Libraries have a significant role in promoting responsible research practices, including transparency and reproducibility, by leveraging their connections to academic communities and collaborating with stakeholders like research funders and publishers. Our recommendations for libraries include: i) partnering with researchers to promote a research culture that values transparency and reproducibility, ii) enhancing existing research infrastructure and support; and iii) investing in raising awareness and developing skills and capacities related to these principles.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data-related tasks are distributed across multiple units including cataloguing, systems and research support.
“Data-related tasks are distributed across multiple units including cataloguing, systems and research support”
From Librarians’ roles and responsibilities in managing data within academic libraries: A role-based data governance model (2026) · cites this paper as Schmidt et al., 2023
The findings present custodianship here as policy-driven and governance-oriented, consistent with Schmidt et al. (2023).
“While previous studies (Bishop et al., 2022;Pinfield et al., 2014) acknowledge preservation roles, the findings present custodianship here as policy-driven and governanceoriented, consistent with Schmidt et al. (2023).”
From Librarians’ roles and responsibilities in managing data within academic libraries: A role-based data governance model (2026) · cites this paper as Schmidt et al. (2023)
By explicitly conceptualising how data move across roles within institutional contexts, this study advances a workflow-oriented perspective and proposes a role-based data governance model for academic libraries, extending lifecycle-oriented arguments presented by Schmidt et al. (2023).
“By explicitly conceptualising how data move across roles within institutional contexts, this study advances a workflow-oriented perspective and proposes a role-based data governance model for academic libraries, extending lifecycleoriented arguments presented by Schmidt et al. (2023).”
From Librarians’ roles and responsibilities in managing data within academic libraries: A role-based data governance model (2026) · cites this paper as Schmidt et al. (2023)
Cites
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Open Science Collaboration (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac4716 · Cited by 8,515 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ayoib, A., Ismail, M. A., & Abdullah, N. (2026) · Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science · doi:10.22452/mjlis.vol31no1.2
“While previous studies (Bishop et al., 2022; Pinfield et al., 2014) acknowledge preservation roles, the findings present custodianship here as policy-driven and governance-oriented, consistent with Schmidt et al. (2023).”
Influential
- Authors
- Schmidt, B., Chiarelli, A., Loffreda, L., & Sondervan, J.
- Affiliations
- Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen (DE)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Schmidt, Birgit
- Loffreda, Lucia
- Sondervan, Jeroen
- Venue
- LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries
- Published
- 2024-01-05
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 1435-5205 (ISSN-L)
- 2213-056X
- OpenAlex
- W4390608077
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- research reproducibility, academic libraries, reproducible research, responsible conduct of research, research transparency, research infrastructure, research culture, LIBER, research funding agencies, scholarly publishing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review