The Properties of Glycosidases of Vitis vinifera and a Comparison of Their β-Glucosidase Activity with that of Exogenous Enzymes. An Assessment of Possible Applications in Enology
Abstract
Glycosidases of Muscat of Alexandria were isolated and further purified. Two β-glucosidases, a β-galactosidase, and two weak α-glucosidases were found. The β-glucosidases, which were located mainly in the juice of the grape, had increased activity with berry maturity. They both had optimal activity at pH 5.0 and were relatively tolerant to 10% ethanol, but they were inhibited by glucose. Chardonnay, Gewürztraminer, Muscat Hamburg, and Thompson Seedless grape varieties had β-glucosidase enzymes with similar properties to those of Muscat of Alexandria. The properties of the β-glucosidases of a commercial pectolytic enzyme, Rohapect C, and of almond emulsin (β-glucosidase, EC 3.2.1.21) were compared with the grape enzymes. The β-glucosidase of Rohapect C was strongly inhibited by glucose. Studies with a mixture of natural monoterpene glycosides from grape showed all the plant-derived enzymes to have an aglycone specificity discriminating against glycosides of tertiary alcohols. The properties of the endogenous and exogenous glycosidases examined limit their usefulness for the release of glycosidically bound flavorants in juice processing or winemaking.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Endogenous grape β-glucosidases have almost nonexistent activity towards grape terpenyl-glycosides in must and wine, probably due to glucose inhibition and poor stability at low pH/high ethanol.
“However, these enzymes exhibit almost nonexistent activity towards grape terpenyl-glycosides in must and wine, probably because they are inhibited by glucose and exhibit poor stability at the low pH and high ethanol concentration (Bayonove et al. 1984, Aryan et al. 1987).”
From Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour (2005) · cites this paper as Aryan et al. 1987
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour
SWIEGERS, J. H., BARTOWSKY, E. J., HENSCHKE, P. A., & PRETORIUS, I. S. (2005) · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00285.x · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aryan, A. P., Wilson, B., Strauss, C. R., & Williams, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Australian Wine Research Institute (AU)
- ORCID
- Williams, P. J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 182-188
- ISSN
- 0002-9254 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4316656804
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Enology and Viticulture (publishedVersion)
- American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Horticultural and Viticultural Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
- Keywords
- β-glucosidase, beta-galactosidase, alpha-glucosidase, grapevine, Muscat of Alexandria, grape juice, berry maturity, glucose inhibition, ethanol tolerance, monoterpene glycosides, pectinase, flavor release, winemaking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review