The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of Elemental Sulfur, Yeast Strain, and Fermentation Medium on Hydrogen Sulfide Production During Fermentation
Abstract
The effect of elemental sulfur on hydrogen sulfide production was investigated in stirred fermentations of a reconstituted commercial white grape juice or a defined juice-like medium. Nine commercial wine yeast strains and three levels of elemental sulfur were studied (0, 1.7, and 3.4 mg/L fermentation) in 117 trials. These levels represent the observed elemental sulfur residues at harvest in commercial vineyards for the 1989 and 1990 seasons (12). The cumulative hydrogen sulfide produced was measured using cadmium hydroxide traps that were collected at 24-hour intervals for five days. Two peaks of hydrogen sulfide production occurred during the fermentations. Peak 1 occurred earlier and was more intense than Peak 2. The two peaks occurred independently of each other. Peak 1 was associated with the yeast strain that was used. Peak 2 was associated with the medium that was used. The amount of elemental sulfur added to the medium was not related to the amount of hydrogen sulfide produced in these fermentations. Specific yeast-medium-sulfur interactions were apparent.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Two distinct phases of hydrogen sulfide production are evident during fermentation (Henschke and Jiranek 1991, Thomas et al. 1993, Henschke and de Kluis 1995, Park et al. 2000).”
From Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour (2005) · cites this paper as Thomas et al. 1993
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour
SWIEGERS, J. H., BARTOWSKY, E. J., HENSCHKE, P. A., & PRETORIUS, I. S. (2005) · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00285.x · Cited by 1,216
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, C. S., Boulton, R. B., Silacci, M. W., & Gubler, W. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-216
- ISSN
- 0002-9254
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review