Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Effect of Elemental Sulfur, Yeast Strain, and Fermentation Medium on Hydrogen Sulfide Production During Fermentation

Thomas, Carla S., Boulton, Roger B., Silacci, Michael W., Gubler, W. Douglas·1993·American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Abstract

The effect of elemental sulfur on hydrogen sulfide production was investigated in stirred fermentations of a reconstituted commercial white grape juice or a defined juice-like medium. Nine commercial wine yeast strains and three levels of elemental sulfur were studied (0, 1.7, and 3.4 mg/L fermentation) in 117 trials. These levels represent the observed elemental sulfur residues at harvest in commercial vineyards for the 1989 and 1990 seasons (12). The cumulative hydrogen sulfide produced was measured using cadmium hydroxide traps that were collected at 24-hour intervals for five days. Two peaks of hydrogen sulfide production occurred during the fermentations. Peak 1 occurred earlier and was more intense than Peak 2. The two peaks occurred independently of each other. Peak 1 was associated with the yeast strain that was used. Peak 2 was associated with the medium that was used. The amount of elemental sulfur added to the medium was not related to the amount of hydrogen sulfide produced in these fermentations. Specific yeast-medium-sulfur interactions were apparent.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5344/ajev.1993.44.2.211

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, C. S., Boulton, R. B., Silacci, M. W., & Gubler, W. D.
Venue
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
Published
1993
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
211-216
ISSN
0002-9254
Cited by
45
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review