Cited by 77Fermentation and Sensory AnalysisHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Considerations for the Use of Yeast and Bacterial Starter Cultures: SO2and Timing of Inoculation

Henick-Kling, Thomas, Park, Yun Hee·1994·American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Abstract

With the increasing use of selected cultures for alcoholic and malolactic fermentation it is important to make sure that the yeast and bacteria used can work effectively either when inoculated together or when inoculated sequentially. In this study, we evaluated four commercial yeast cultures and three commercial bacterial starter cultures for their compatibility. When inoculated at the same time into grape must, the SO2 added to the must before inoculation and that produced by the yeast during alcoholic fermentation mainly determines whether the bacteria survive and initiate malolactic fermentation. In grape must to which SO2 had been added at pressing, the additional SO2 produced by the yeast during fermentation caused a sharp decrease in the viability of the cultures and malolactic fermentation was inhibited until 15 to 40 days after completion of alcoholic fermentation; in some combinations of yeast and bacteria, malolactic fermentation was not completed within 40 days. The four yeast strains tested produced a maximum of between 13 and 42 mg/L SO2 during fermentation, the larger amounts of SO2 being strongly inhibitory to the growth of the bacteria. Concurrent malolactic and alcoholic fermentation was possible in must to which no SO2 had been added. When inoculated after completion of alcoholic fermentation, growth of the bacterial starter was faster with two of the yeast cultures tested. This effect also seemed to be due to the small amount of SO2 produced by these strai…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5344/ajev.1994.45.4.464

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Addition of citric acid to wine can increase diacetyl and also form other metabolites, particularly acetic acid.

    “Though the addition of citric acid to wine can be accompanied by an increase of diacetyl, the formation of other flavour metabolites, particularly acetic acid, can also result (Henick-Kling and Park 1994).”

    From Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour (2005) · cites this paper as Henick-Kling and Park 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henick-Kling, T., & Park, Y. H.
Venue
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
Published
1994
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
464-469
ISSN
0002-9254 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2414144378
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Horticultural and Viticultural Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
malolactic fermentation, alcoholic fermentation, yeast starter cultures, lactic acid bacteria, bacterial starter cultures, sulfur dioxide, grape must, inoculation timing, sequential inoculation, wine fermentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review