Cited by 0Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studiesUrban and Rural Development ChallengesLegal Rights and Human Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 25 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

El ejercicio del derecho a la vivienda adecuada relacionado con la libertad de asociación: A propósito del caso Figueroa con Comité de Vivienda Los Jardines de Nogales

Open access
Torres, Tatiana Belen·2021·Anuario de Derechos Humanos

Abstract

No es desconocido que la perturbación al ejercicio y la directa violación al derecho a la vivienda adecuada es una realidad que se ha manifestado con mayor dureza durante esta pandemia. Tampoco lo es, la situación de que los tribunales no otorgan protección jurisdiccional, no ya para exigir su cumplimiento, sino para detener los actos que entorpecen su correcto ejercicio. Este trabajo pretende comentar los aspectos principales de la sentencia de la Corte Suprema de 15 de marzo de 2021, que da luces sobre como finalmente un derecho tan íntimamente relacionado con la dignidad humana, debe ponerse al centro del razonamiento jurídico en materia judicial.

Verification finished with gaps

Some checks didn’t finish. The results below cover the steps that did.

  1. Registry recordVerified
  2. Full textRead the full text
  3. Reference list1 reference found
  4. Reference check1 of 1 references checked
  5. StatisticsRecomputed
  6. Claims43 claims anchored to a quote
  7. Cited sourcesChecked
  8. Self-checkDidn’t finish — the rest of the report still applies.
  9. VerificationFindings verified

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This article analyzes the Chilean Supreme Court’s 15 March 2021 judgment (rol 5.168-2021), which revoked the rejection of Claudia Figueroa Pizarro’s protección appeal and annulled her expulsion from the Comité de Vivienda Los Jardines de Nogales. The author argues the Court correctly linked freedom of association with the right to adequate housing through Article 5(2) of the Chilean Constitution and international human rights treaties, while criticizing the Contraloría’s contrary position.

Key findings

  • The Supreme Court’s Third Chamber revoked the prior decision and accepted the recurso de protección, leaving without effect the expulsion of Claudia Figueroa Pizarro from the housing committee; it characterized the expulsion as the maximum statutory sanction and “manifiestamente desproporcionada” because the attributed conduct caused no concrete harm to the committee or its members.
  • The Court grounded the right to adequate housing in Article 25(1) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 11 of the ICESCR, applying these via Article 5(2) of the Chilean Constitution, and recognized the interdependence between freedom of association (Article 19(15) of the Constitution) and the right to dignified housing.
  • The author emphasizes that housing committees are the exclusive vehicle for collective applications to Minvu housing subsidies under DS 49 de 2011, so expulsion from such a committee obstructs members’ access to adequate housing.
  • The author criticizes Contraloría Dictamen 23.470 de 2016, which held that expulsion from a housing committee is a private matter for the committee and that Serviu or Contraloría need not review its legality; she argues all state organs should exercise conventionality control.

Methods

  • Doctrinal and case-commentary analysis of Chilean Supreme Court judgment rol 5.168-2021, arising from recurso de protección rol 40.436-2020, and of related national and international human rights norms.
  • The analysis draws on the Chilean Constitution, UDHR, ICESCR, ICCPR, Vienna Convention, General Comments 4 and 9 of the CESCR, Inter-American Court cases such as Lagos del Campo and Cinco Pensionistas, and doctrinal sources including Abramovich and Courtis, Alston and Goodman, Gil, and others.
  • No empirical data, sample, or statistical analysis is used; the paper is a normative and interpretive legal argument.

Limitations

  • The paper states that, for reasons of length, it cannot analyze Atria’s argument on the enforceability of social rights (“por razones de extensión no es posible analizarlo”).
  • Evident from the text: it is a single-case doctrinal commentary without empirical sample or systematic jurisprudence review.
  • Evident from the text: the author is a legal analyst at Serviu, the regional housing service, which may inform her critical stance toward Contraloría and Serviu, though the paper does not frame this as a limitation.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5354/0718-2279.2021.61850

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 25 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 5 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 27
38 of 38

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

This check didn’t finish.

Citations

Cites

  • Untitled work

    (2010) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 47

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Abramovich, Victor y Christian Courtis (1997). «Hacia la exigibilidad de los de- rechos económicos, sociales y culturales: Estándares internacionales y criterios de aplicación ante los tribunales locales». En La aplicación de los tratados sobre derechos humanos por los tribunales locales (pp. 283-350). Buenos Aires: Editores del Puerto.
  2. Alston, Philip y Ryan Goodsman (2013). International human rights: The successor to international human rights in context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Gil, Diego (2020). «Derecho a la vivienda» En Pablo Contreras y Constanza Salga- do (editores), Curso de derechos fundamentales (pp. 857-887). Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch. Marshall, Pablo (2017). «Clasificación de los derechos fundamentales». En Pablo Contreras y Constanza Salgado (editores), Manual sobre derechos fundamentales: Teoría General (pp. 93-118). Santiago: Lom.

Metadata

Authors
Torres, T. B.
Venue
Anuario de Derechos Humanos
Published
2021-07-31
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
109
ISSN
  • 0718-2058 (ISSN-L)
  • 0718-2279
OpenAlex
W3191550380
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
Anuario de Derechos Humanos (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
Keywords
right to housing, freedom of association, Spanish Supreme Court, COVID-19 pandemic, housing discrimination, human dignity, judicial protection of fundamental rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-17, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-17 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review