Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1Eurasian Exchange NetworksArchaeology and Historical StudiesAncient Near East History

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

KHAIR KHANEH AND ITS CHINESE EVIDENCES

Open access
KUWAYAMA, SHOSHIN·1975·Orient

Abstract

It is well known that the first volume of the Ta-T'ang Hsi-yu-chi 大 唐 西 域 記 is a record of the various Central Asian countries actually visited or known by hearsay by the famous Chinese pilgrim Hsuan-tsang 玄 弉 who was on the way to North India. The last country of this volume is Chia-pi-shih 迦 畢 試, or Kapisi, which is the first country after crossing the Hindu Kush. Here Hsuantsang described Hinduism by using terms such as T'ien-tz'u 天 祠 (Deva temples), I-tao 異 道 (heretics), and T'u-hui Wai-tao 塗 灰 外 道 (ascetics who cover themselves with ashes). This is the earliest written evidence which directly shows that Hinduism had already expanded to Afghanistan in the early 7th century A.D. and that this is the westernmost reach of this religion. The relations between Buddhism and Hinduism in the Kabul valley and its vicinity have been discussed previously from the viewpoint of the materials used as objects of worship.(1) It has been argued, too, that the town named Si-pi-to-fa-la-tz'u 雷 蔽 多 伐 剌 祠 recorded by Hsuan-tsang had been occupied by the pasupata sect of Saivism and that this town was identified with Tapa Skandar about 30km south of Begram.(2) But, A-lu-nao shan 阿 路 揉 山 or Mount Aruna, also described as situated about 30 Chinese miles south of the town Si-pi-to-fa-la-tz'u, has remained open to the identification. The following is an attempt to prove that this mountain is identical with Khair Khaneh, and that, consequently, Khair Khaneh can be dated with absolute certainty. The sect, which worshipped a deity called Shun T'ien-shen 順 天 神 (Shun deva) and centered on Ts'ung-ling-shan 葱 嶺 山 (Mount Pamir), struggled in the early 7th century against the sect whose deity was related to Aruna, and, in consequence, the former was defeated and moved southward to Mount Tsu-na-hi-lo 稿 那 咽

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5356/orient1960.11.93

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. S. Kuwayama, Dairiseki Hindu-zo wa Hindu-Ohcho no monoka?, Tohogakuho, xliii, 1972; pp. 1-54.
  2. S.Kuwayama, The First Excavation at Tapa Skandar, Archaeological Survey of Kyoto Uni- versity in Afghanistan in 1970, Kyoto, 1972, p. 13; S. Kuwayama, Begram III; Renewing its Dating, Orient, x, 1975, pp. 76-77.
  3. Watters, p. 124. See also A. Cunningham, Ancient Geography of India, I. The Buddhist Period, Varanasi, 1963 (Reprinted), p. 17. (6) Orient, x. pp. 56-78. (7) Watters, pp. 124-130; Beal, pp. 58-68.
  4. G. Tucci, East and West, n. s. ix, pp. 328-329;
  5. M.K. Dhavalikar, East and West, xxi, 3-4, pp. 331-336; Tohogakuho, xliii, p. 6. (9) See East and West, xxi, 3-4, p. 331.
  6. The information came in 1970 from the ex-Director General of Archaeology, Govern- ment of Afghanistan. (11) Tohogakuho, xliii, pp. 12-16.
  7. MDAFA, xix, p. 35. (13) MDAFA, vii p. 4; Tohogakuho, xliii, pp. 1-4.
  8. Sylvain Levi et Ed. Chavannes, L'Itineraire d'Ou-K'ong (751-790), Journal Asiatique 1895, pp. 374-375. His identification is based on the description of the Sui-shu and the analogy of the names. (18) Toyogakuho, vii-1, 1917, pp. 33-102; The Complete Works of Shiratori Kurakichi, vi, p. 350 f., or Studies in the History of Western Countries, i. p. 450 f. (All of them are in Japanese).
  9. Uchida Ginpu, "Reconstruction of the Hsi-yu t'u-chi" edited by P'ei-chu, Studies in the His- tory and Buddhism in commemoration of the 70th Birthday of Professor Fujiwara Kodo, 1973, pp. 115-128, 内 田 吟 風, 隋 ・裴 矩 撰 「西 域 圖 記 」 遺 文 纂 考, 藤 原 弘道 先 生 古 稀 記 念 史 學 佛 教 學 論 集.
  10. MDAFA, vii, p. 5. (29) See plans in MDAFA, viii, pp. 104 and 106, and also in Orient, x, p. 60.
  11. The bastions at Begram were discussed in Orient, x, pp. 59-61.

Cited by

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
KUWAYAMA, S.
Affiliations
Kyoto City University of Arts (JP)
Corresponding author
KUWAYAMA, SHOSHIN
Venue
Orient
Published
1975
Volume
11
Pages
93-107
ISSN
  • 0473-3851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1884-1392
OpenAlex
W1991068264
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Orient (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Eurasian Exchange Networks
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Historical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
Keywords
Chinese historical sources, Persian historiography, Chinese chronicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: KHAIR KHANEH AND ITS CHINESE EVIDENCES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5356/orient1960.11.93
The paper
KUWAYAMA, S. (1975). KHAIR KHANEH AND ITS CHINESE EVIDENCES. Orient. https://doi.org/10.5356/orient1960.11.93

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.