The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plagiarism: Deterrence, Detection and Prevention
Open accessAbstract
This is a link to a 'plagiarism-risk quiz' (using passages from an economics text) developed by the Goucher College Writing Program.It is an interactive resource that students might find helpful.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Williams supports the attitude that the main course of prevention is the assigning of innovative and interesting tasks and that in addition to prevention there must also be deterrence, which discourages attempts at plagiarism due to unprofitability and the potential penalties (Williams, 2005).”
From Taxonomy of academic plagiarism methods (2021) · cites this paper as Williams, 2005
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Suggested reading Bannister, P. and Ashworth, P. (1998) 'Four good reasons for cheating and plagiarism', in C. Rust (ed.), Improving Student Learning Symposium, Centre for Staff Development, Oxford
- Carroll, J. (2002) A Handbook for Deterring Plagiarism in Higher Education, OCSLD, Oxford
- Groarke, M. Oblinger, D. and Choa, M. (2001) 'Term paper mills, anti-plagiarism tools, and academic integrity', Educause Review, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 40-8.
- Herrington, J. and Herrington, A. (1998) 'Authentic assessment and multimedia: how university students respond to a model of authentic assessment', Higher Education Research and Development, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 305-22.
- Park, C. (2003) 'In other (people's) words: plagiarism by university students -literature and lessons', Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 471-88.
- Wiggins, G. (1990) 'The case for authentic assessment', Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, vol. 2, no. 2, online at http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=2 (last accessed 12 June 2004). References
- Ashworth, P., Bannister, P. and Thorne, P. (1997) 'Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perception of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment', Studies in Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 187-203.
- Carroll, J. (2002) A Handbook for Deterring Plagiarism in Higher Education, OCSLD, Oxford
- Drake, C. A. (1941) 'Why students cheat', Journal of Higher Education, vol. 12, pp. 418-20.
- Herrington, J. and Herrington, A. (1998) 'Authentic assessment and multimedia: how university students respond to a model of authentic assessment', Higher Education Research and Development, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 305-22.
- Howard, R. M. (2002) 'Don't police plagiarism: just teach!', Education Digest, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 46-9.
- Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S. and Cauffman, E. (2002) 'It's wrong, but everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students', Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 209-28. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) (2003) 'Why do students plagiarise?', online at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=plagiarism_why (last accessed 12 June 2004).
- McCabe, D. and Trevino, L. K. (2002) 'Honesty and honor codes', Academe, vol. 88, no. 1, online at http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2002/02JF/02jfmcc.htm (last accessed 12 June 2004).
- McKenzie, J. (1998) 'The new plagiarism: seven antidotes to prevent highway robbery in an electronic age', From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal, vol. 7, no. 8, online at http://www.fno.org/may98/cov98may.html (last accessed 12 June 2004).
- Ramsden, P. (1992) Learning to Teach in Higher Education, Routledge, London.
- Renard, L. (1999) 'Cut and paste 101: plagiarism and the net', Educational Leadership, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 38-42.
- Smith, D. (1999) 'Supervising NESB students from Confucian educational cultures', in Y. Ryan and O. Zuber-Skerritt (eds), Supervising Postgraduates from Non-English-speaking Backgrounds, SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Taxonomy of academic plagiarism methods
Vrbanec, T., & Meštrović, A. (2021) · Zbornik Veleučilišta u Rijeci · doi:10.31784/zvr.9.1.17 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, J. B.
- Corresponding author
- Williams, Jeremy B.
- ORCID
- Williams, Jeremy B.
- Publisher
- The Economics Network
- Published
- 2005-04
- OpenAlex
- W3011129092
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Funders
- Coastal Carolina University
- Northumbria University
- Joint Information Systems Committee
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- plagiarism, plagiarism avoidance, plagiarism detection, deterrence, academic integrity, writing instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
