The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ongoing local transmission of dengue in Japan, August to September 2014
Open accessAbstract
WPSAR Vol 5, No 4, 2014 | doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2014.5.3.007 www.wpro.who.int/wpsar 1 a Infectious Disease Surveillance Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan. b Department of Virology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan. c Department of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan. Submitted: 26 September 2014; Published: 28 October 2014 doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2014.5.3.007 In late August 2014, three autochthonous dengue cases were reported in Japan. Since then, as of 17 September 2014, a total of 131 autochthonous cases have been confirmed. While cases were reported from throughout Japan, the majority were linked to visiting a large park or its vicinity in Tokyo, and the serotype detected has been serotype 1. We report preliminary findings, along with the public health response activities, of the first documented autochthonous dengue outbreak in Japan in nearly 70 years.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 2014, Japan reported an outbreak of 162 autochthonous dengue cases for the first time in nearly 70 years, of which more than 90% (148/160, from available data) had visited or worked near parks in central Tokyo, and the dominant serotype was DENV-1.
“In 2014, an outbreak of 162 autochthonous dengue cases was reported for the first time in nearly 70 years, of which more than 90% (148/160, from available data) had visited or worked near parks in central Tokyo, and the dominant serotype was DENV-1. (5, 27, 28)”
From Epidemiology of dengue reported in the World Health Organization Western Pacific Region, 2013–2019 (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Epidemiology of dengue reported in the World Health Organization Western Pacific Region, 2013–2019
Togami, E., Chiew, M., Lowbridge, C., Biaukula, V., Bell, L., Yajima, A., Eshofonie, A., Saulo, D., Do, H. T. H., Otsu, S., et al. (2023) · Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal · doi:10.5365/wpsar.2023.14.1.973 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Arima, Y., Matsui, T., Shimada, T., Ishikane, M., Kawabata, K., Sunagawa, T., Kinoshita, H., Takasaki, T., Tsuda, Y., Sawabe, K., & Oishi, K.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Infectious Diseases (JP)
- Venue
- Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal
- Published
- 2014-10-30
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 27-29
- ISSN
- 2094-7313 (ISSN-L)
- 2094-7321
- PMC
- PMC4318974
- OpenAlex
- W2043652069
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Western Pacific surveillance response journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
- Keywords
- dengue, local transmission, dengue surveillance, Japan, 2014 outbreak
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Dengue, Dengue Virus, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Seasons, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
