Cited by 3Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceParanormal Experiences and BeliefsJungian Analytical Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Comment on The Hidden Spring

Nagel, Thomas·2021·Journal of Consciousness Studies

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53765/20512201.28.11.203

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 3

Metadata

Authors
Nagel, T.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Nagel, Thomas
Venue
Journal of Consciousness Studies
Published
2021-11-20
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
203-209
ISSN
1355-8250 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200128037
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consciousness Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Jungian Analytical Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review