Cited by 5Coconut Research and ApplicationsSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsFood Chemistry and Fat Analysis

INFLUÊNCIA DO PROCESSAMENTO NAS CARACTERÍSTICAS SENSORIAIS DA ÁGUA-DE-COCO

Open access
LUVIELMO, MÁRCIA DE MELLO, DE VASCONCELOS, MARCUS ARTHUR MARÇAL, MARQUES, GLÓRIA RAMALHO, DA SILVA, ROBERTA PISANI GOMES, DAMÁSIO, MARIA HELENA·2004·Boletim do Centro de Pesquisa de Processamento de Alimentos

Abstract

O presente estudo teve por objetivo efetuar análise descritiva quantitativa de águas-de-coco e comparar o efeito de diferentes processamentos nas características sensoriais dos produtos. Foram utilizadas duas amostras de água-de-coco congeladas, uma pasteurizada por processo convencional e outra em microondas. Os resultados mostraram que a amostra pasteurizada em microondas apresentou (significativamente) os menores valores para as características típicas da água-de-coco verde, ao contrário das amostras congeladas. A amostra processada por pasteurização convencional apresentou maior intensidade dos atributos aroma e sabor de passado e aroma de ranço. INFLUENCE OF PROCESSING IN THE SENSORIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF COCONUT WATER Abstract The present study had as objective to realize quantitative descriptive analysis of coconut waters and to compare the effect of different processing types in the sensorial characteristics of the products. Two samples of frozen coconut water were utilized, one pasteurized by conventional process and other by microwave. The results demonstrated that the sample pasteurized by microwave showed (significantly) the lower values for typical characteristics of green coconut water, in contrary of the frozen samples. The sample processed by conventional pasteurization presented higher intensity of the attributes aroma and over-pass and rancid flavor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5380/cep.v22i2.1193

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Frozen coconut water samples showed the best values for typical characteristics of green coconut water, contrary to microwave-heated samples.

    “Contrary to microwave-heated samples, the frozen coconut water samples showed the best values for typical characteristics of green coconut water.”

    From Coconut water preservation and processing: a review (2012) · cites this paper as [79]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LUVIELMO, M. D. M., DE VASCONCELOS, M. A. M., MARQUES, G. R., DA SILVA, R. P. G., & DAMÁSIO, M. H.
Venue
Boletim do Centro de Pesquisa de Processamento de Alimentos
Published
2004-12-31
Volume
22
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0102-0323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1983-9774
OpenAlex
W2047097183
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Locations
  • Boletim do Centro de Pesquisa de Processamento de Alimentos (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Keywords
coconut water, sensory properties, pasteurization, microwave pasteurization, green coconut water, rancid flavor, off-flavor, aroma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review