Taking the Temperature of Hydrothermal Ore Deposits Using Clumped Isotope Thermometry
Open accessAbstract
Better tools are needed to map the thermal structure of ore deposits. Here, carbonate clumped isotope thermometry is applied for the first time in epithermal, skarn, and carbonate-hosted deposits to identify the conditions involved in metal transport and deposition. Clumped isotope temperature calibrations were tested by measurement of carbonates from three geothermal fields in the Taupo volcanic zone, New Zealand, that record growth temperatures between 130° and 310°C. Results for modern Taupo volcanic zone calcites were paired with known fluid δ18O values and these indicate precipitation in equilibrium with produced geothermal waters. Measurements carried out at the Waihi low sulfidation deposit in New Zealand, the Antamina polymetallic skarn in Peru, and the Mount Isa sediment hosted Pb-Zn and Cu deposit in Queensland, Australia, demonstrate that clumped isotope values are sensitive to temperature gradients defined using other methods. At Waihi, an andesite-hosted deposit, temperature controls the majority of variation in carbonate mineral δ18O. At Mount Isa, ~300° to 400°C temperatures were recorded in a 1.5 Ga orebody, which are consistent with fluid inclusion values, highlighting the longevity of clumped isotope archives in dolomite minerals. Collectively, these results demonstrate the potential for clumped isotopes to delineate the heat footprint around deposits that contain carbonates, and to more effectively disentangle magmatic and meteoric fluid δ18O signals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clumped isotope data for subsurface carbonates have placed new constraints on ore formation.
“ore formation (e.g., del Real et al. 2016, Mering et al. 2018)”
From Frontiers of Carbonate Clumped Isotope Thermometry (2023) · cites this paper as Mering et al. 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Mering, J. A., Barker, S. L. L., Huntington, K. W., Simmons, S., Dipple, G., Andrew, B., & Schauer, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Waikato (NZ)
- Centre for Ore Deposit and Earth Sciences (AU)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Mering, John A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Economic Geology
- Publisher
- Society of Economic Geologists
- Published
- 2018-12-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1671-1678
- ISSN
- 0361-0128 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-0774
- OpenAlex
- W2912521996
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Economic Geology (publishedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Geochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits
- Keywords
- clumped isotope thermometry, hydrothermal deposits, epithermal deposits, skarn deposits, carbonate-hosted deposits, Taupo Volcanic Zone, geothermal field, calcite, dolomite, oxygen isotopes, fluid inclusions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review