Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characteristics and Models for Carlin-Type Gold Deposits

·2000·Gold in 2000

Abstract

Abstract Carlin-type gold deposits are restricted to a small part of the North American Cordillera, in northern Nevada and northwest Utah, and formed over a short interval of time (42–30 Ma) in the mid-Tertiary when the Yellowstone mantle plume is inferred to have been located below the subduction zone. They formed after a change in plate motions (43 Ma) at, or soon after, the onset of extension in an east-west-trending, subduction-related magmatic belt. The deposits do not show consistent spatial relationships to mid-Tertiary magmatic centers, rather, most are located along long-lived, deep crustal structures inherited from Late Proterozoic rifting and formation of a passive margin. These structures influenced subsequent patterns of sedimentation and deformation and localized multiple episodes of igneous and hydrothermal activity, many of which contain anomalous concentrations of gold. The mid-Tertiary surface topography was relatively flat and many systems were located below large shallow lakes. Most deposits are hosted in a Paleozoic miogeoclinal carbonate sequence that is either structurally overlain by a eugeoclinal siliciclastic sequence, the Roberts Mountains allochthon emplaced in Early Mississippian time, or stratigraphically overlain by a miogeoclinal siliciclastic sequence deposited in the resulting foredeep. These siliciclastic sequences are less permeable than underlying carbonate rocks and apparently caused fluids ascending along major structures to flow laterally into permeable and reactive rocks below them. In these areas, gold ore is localized at intersections of a complex array of structures with permeable and reactive strata. The common alteration, mineralogy, and geochemical signature of these deposits is a direct expression of the P, T, and composition of ore fluids. The deposits generally formed at depths of >2 km at temperatures of 250° to 150°C, from moderately acidic (pH ≈5), reduced fluids containing <6 wt percent NaCl equiv, <4 mole percent CO2, <0.4 mole percent CH4, and >0.01 mole percent H2S. The H2S concentration was critical because it suppressed the solubility of Fe, base metals, and Ag as chloride complexes and enhanced the solubility of Au and associated trace elements (e.g., As, Sb, Tl, and Hg) as sulfide complexes. Gold was transported as AuHS° and/or Au(HS)2−1 complexes. The main ore stage formed during cooling and neutralization of ore fluids by reactions with the host rocks. It is characterized by carbonate dissolution, argillization of silicates, sulfidation of ferroan minerals, and silicification of limestone. Gold occurs as submicron inclusions or solid solution in arsenian pyrite and precipitated as H2S was consumed by sulfidation of Fe released from ferroan minerals. The other common trace elements (e.g., Sb, Tl, Hg) also reside in arsenian pyrite. The ideal host rock consists of permeable ferroan carbonate that is completely dissolved and its contained iron completely sulfidized such that all that remains is gold-bearing arsenian pyrite. Accordingly, large tonnage, low-grade gold deposits (e.g., Gold Quarry) are in siliceous rocks with low carbonate and reactive iron contents, and small tonnage, high-grade gold deposits (e.g., Meikle) are in carbonate rocks with high concentrations of reactive iron. Late ore-stage quartz, calcite, orpiment, realgar, stibnite, and barite occur in open fractures and pores and their abundance varies tremendously from deposit to deposit. These minerals precipitated as the systems cooled and ore fluids mixed with local ground water. Boiling was generally not important. Isotopic data from different districts yield conflicting indications as to the source of ore fluids. Abundant stable isotope data (δD, δ18O, δ13C, δ34S) and limited radiogenic isotope data (Pb, Sr, Os) from the major trends and districts are consistent with models involving the circulation of meteoric water through sedimentary rocks. In contrast, δD, δ18O, and δ13C data from the Getchell trend suggest that gold was introduced by a deep-sourced fluid that was of metamorphic or magmatic origin. The apparent lack of mid-Tertiary intrusions in this district argues for a metamorphic fluid, although the characteristics of certain portions and stages of the deposits suggest there was a magmatic fluid component characterized by higher Cl, Fl, K, Fe, and Cs contents. N2/Ar/He ratios of fluid inclusions suggest there were inputs of mantle He. Carlin-type deposits do not fit neatly into any one of the models proposed for them. Although variably evolved meteoric water is present in all of them, they are deeper than low-sulfidation epithermal veins and there is little or no evidence of boiling. They are shallower than orogenic veins and metamorphic fluids have only been detected in one district. Magmatic models call upon concealed intrusions that are so far removed from the deposits that no coeval contact metamorphic rocks, breccia pipes, or zoned geochemical halos are recognized a

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5382/rev.13.05

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Venue
Gold in 2000
Published
2000
Pages
163-220
OpenAlex
W2466503841
Cited by
335
References
1
FWCI
13.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characteristics and Models for Carlin-Type Gold Deposits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5382/rev.13.05
The paper
Characteristics and Models for Carlin-Type Gold Deposits. (2000). Gold in 2000. https://doi.org/10.5382/rev.13.05

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.