Manhaj Kritik Matan Hadis Ibn Al-Qayyim: Kajian Terhadap Kitab Al-Manār Al-Munīf: The Methods of Matan Hadith Criticism Ibn Al-Qayyim: A Study of Al-Manār Al-Munīf
Open accessAbstract
Ibn al-Qayyim merupakan salah seorang tokoh hadis yang menonjol pada abad ke 8 Hijrah. Kesarjanaan Ibn al-Qayyim dalam mengutarakan kritikan terhadap hadis terutamanya pada sudut matan telah menjadi topik perbahasan yang rancak dalam kalangan ilmuwan hadis sejak abad ke 10 Hijrah sehingga zaman moden kini. Justeru, kajian ini meneliti tentang manhaj kritik matan hadis Ibn al-Qayyim menerusi kitab beliau yang berjudul al-Manār al-Munīf. Biografi ringkas Ibn al-Qayyim turut dinyatakan. Kajian ini menggunakan metodologi kajian kepustakaan. Setiap data yang diperolehi dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode induktif dan analisis kandungan. Kajian mendapati empat kriteria utama yang penting di sisi Ibn al-Qayyim dalam aplikasi kritik matan hadis. Dapatan kajian ini diperolehi daripada analisis jawapan Ibn al-Qayyim terhadap soalan yang ditujukan kepada beliau mengenai kemungkinan mengenal hadis palsu secara pasti tanpa dimulai kajian menerusi sanad. Hasil penelitian daripada kajian menunjukkan kriteria penting di sisi Ibn al-Qayyim dalam manhaj kritik matannya adalah matan hadis mengandungi perumpamaan melampau, matan hadis bercanggah secara jelas dengan akal, matan hadis mengandungi ketetapan tarikh-tarikh tertentu dan matan hadis berunsur petua-petua ganjil dalam perubatan. Kajian ini membawa implikasi positif dalam mendepani penyebaran hadis palsu dalam kalangan masyarakat yang semakin menular mutakhir ini. Harapan kajian adalah dapat menambah sumbangan kepada perbendaharaan ilmu tentang kajian kritik hadis secara khusus di samping membantu umat Islam bersikap lebih berhati-hati menerima hadis Nabi SAW lalu menyebarkannya tanpa semakan bagi memelihara kemuliaan dan kedudukannya yang tinggi dalam agama Islam.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Once the Prophet passed away, textual criticism among the Companions grew stronger.
“Once the Prophet passed away, textual criticism among the Companions grew stronger (Mohd Razak & Nazri, 2024).”
From Evolution of Hadith Textual Criticism: From Classical to Contemporary Approaches (2025) · cites this paper as Mohd Razak & Nazri, 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Rujukan Aan Rukmana. (2017). Kedudukan Akal dalam al-Qur'an dan al-Hadis. Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran dan Keislaman, 1(1), 23-34. doi:https://doi.org/10.36671/mumtaz.v1i1. · DOI
- al-Munawar, S. A. (2020). Metode Kritik Matan Hadis Menurut Pandangan Muhadditsin Mutaqaddimin. Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 2(1), 148-165.
- Maswara, H. (2013). Kritik Matan Hadis Di Kalangan Sahabat. TAHKIM: JURNAL HUKUM DAN SYARIAH, 9(2), 147-172.
- Rijal, M. B. (2019). Analisis hadith-hadith yang matannya bercanggah dengan fakta sejarah. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/: https://www.academia.edu/42859767/
- Sati, A. (2018). Hadis Palsu dan Hukum Meriwayatkannya. Jurnal El-Qanuny, 4(1), 1-15.
- Suryadinata, M. (2020). Kritik Matan Hadis: Klasik hingga Kontemporer. Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 2(2), 111-129.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Hadith Textual Criticism: From Classical to Contemporary Approaches
Razak, N. M. A. M., Nazri, M. A., Majid, L. A., Amran, N. N., & Ibrahim, N. S. (2025) · Global Journal Al-Thaqafah · doi:10.7187/gjatsi122025-2
Self-citation
- Authors
- Mohd Razak, N. M. A., & Nazri, M. A.
- Affiliations
- National University of Malaysia (MY)
- Venue
- Jurnal Pengajian Islam
- Published
- 2024-12-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 140-152
- ISSN
- 1823-7126 (ISSN-L)
- 0127-8002
- OpenAlex
- W4404931885
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- ms
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Jurnal Pengajian Islam (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Medical Research and Islamic Perspectives
- Keywords
- Ibn al-Qayyim, hadith criticism, matn criticism, fabricated hadith, hadith authenticity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
