Cited by 9Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An interpretative phenomenological analysis of maternal identity following child suicide: Abridged

Thrift, Olivia, Coyle, Adrian·2005·Counselling Psychology Review

Abstract

There has been an absence of research into identity issues associated with mothers who have lost a child through suicide. This paper attempts to bridge this gap by reporting findings from a qualitative study of six mothers who lost one child and one mother who lost two children, over the age of 16, to suicide. Participants were interviewed about important components of their maternal identity, the psychological and social implications of losing their child to suicide and strategies for managing the difficulties associated with this. The use of interpretative phenomenological analysis provided insight into and understanding of the participants’ accounts. Much of the data could be readily interpreted in terms of identity dynamics, including identity threat. Participants consistently reported feelings of failure, stigmatisation and negative distinctiveness. Various strategies were reportedly used by participants to manage identity threat. These included trying to find an explanation for the suicide that did not implicate themselves as a potential cause and joining groups with others bereaved by suicide. From the insights gained, recommendations are offered for psychological interventions which might help mothers who have lost a child through suicide to manage identity threat.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53841/bpscpr.2005.20.2.18

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: sadness and depression. London: Hogarth.
  2. Bowlby, J. (1985). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 3. Loss: sadness and depression. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  3. Breakwell, G.M. (1996). Identity processes and social changes. In G.M. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds.), Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social change. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
  4. Dion, K. (1989). Gender differences in parental roles. Paper presented at Nags Head Conference on Sex and Gender, Nags Head, NC.
  5. Hagman, G. (2001). Beyond decathexis: Toward a new psychoanalytic understanding of mourning, In R.A. Neimeyer (Ed.), Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. · DOI
  6. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York: Free Press.
  7. Lindemann, 1944, Symptomatology and management of acute grief, American Journal of Psychiatry, 101, 1141, 10.1176/ajp.101.2.141 · DOI
  8. Maurer, 2001, Parental identity and reflected-appraisals: Measurement and gender dynamics, Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 309, 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00309.x · DOI
  9. McIntosh, 1987, Control group studies of suicide survivors: A review and critique, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour, 23, 146, 10.1111/j.1943-278X.1993.tb00379.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1080/073993301300003135 · DOI
  11. Schaefer, J.A. & Moos, R.H. (1992). Life crises and personal growth. In B.N. Carpenter (Ed.), Personal coping: Theory, research and applications. London: Praeger.
  12. Smith, J.A. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J.A. Smith , R. Harre & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp.9–26). London: Sage. · DOI
  13. 10.1080/08870449608400256 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Smith, 1997, Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the psychological preparation for motherhood, British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 409, 10.1348/014466699164248 · DOI
  15. Smith, J.A. , Jarman, M. & Osborn, M. (1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods. London: Sage. · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1161 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/713685822 · DOI
  18. Wertheimer, A. (1991). A special scar: The experience of people bereaved by suicide. London: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thrift, O., & Coyle, A.
Venue
Counselling Psychology Review
Published
2005-05
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
18-23
ISSN
  • 1757-2142 (ISSN-L)
  • 2396-8672
OpenAlex
W4315847720
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Counselling Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
maternal identity, child suicide, suicide bereavement, identity threat, stigmatization, coping strategies, grief support groups, psychological intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review