Computerised CBT: University students experiences of using an online self-help programme
Abstract
Objectives: This study explores the potential for a computerised self-help programme within the context of a higher education (HE) environment. At Teesside University the CALM Approach(CALM: Computer Aided Lifestyle Management) has been in operation since October 2007. There is a need within HE to cater for the increasing number of students who are presenting with distress in their mental health and well-being and to provide these students with alternatives to the traditional support services. Design: Nine students self referred to participate in the study. Participants self-referred to two groups: group 1 attended a face-to-face interview, and group 2 returned an anonymous questionnaire. The study evaluated six face-to-face semi-structured interviews and three anonymous semi-structured questionnaires. All participants had used the CALM Approach during the academic year. Data analysis: Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis was used to explore the participants’ experience and personal views of using the CALM Approach. Results: In group 1, 10 superordinate themes were established. In group 2, five superordinate themes were established. The themes describe different aspects of how participants experienced using the CALM Approach and how this impacted on their personal and university development. Conclusions: It was suggested that the CALM Approach is a viable option for providing computerised self-help to meet the mental health and well-being needs of HE students. All participants reported positive experiences and positive changes in their lives as a result of using the CALM Approach. Computerised self-help was seen as a useful support tool for HE students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of studies reported small sample size as a limitation.
“small sample size [51,52,55,60,68,78,79]”
From Do online mental health services improve help-seeking for young people? A systematic review (2014) · cites this paper as [55]
Young people suggested that these services were accessible and available [51,53,55,71,74].
“young people suggested that these services were accessible and available [51,53,55,71,74]”
From Do online mental health services improve help-seeking for young people? A systematic review (2014) · cites this paper as [55]
Young people suggested that these services allowed personal stories to be shared with others [55,73-76].
“allowed personal stories to be shared with others [55,73-76]”
From Do online mental health services improve help-seeking for young people? A systematic review (2014) · cites this paper as [55]
Seven studies [52,53,55,63,77-79] developed the intervention that they were evaluating, which may have led to a bias towards more favorable reporting.
“Seven studies [52,53,55,63,77-79] developed the intervention that they were evaluating, which may have led to a bias towards more favorable reporting.”
From Do online mental health services improve help-seeking for young people? A systematic review (2014) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Davis-McCabe, C., & Winthrop, A.
- Affiliations
- Teesside University (GB)
- Venue
- Counselling Psychology Review
- Publisher
- British Psychological Society
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 46-55
- ISSN
- 1757-2142 (ISSN-L)
- 2396-8672
- OpenAlex
- W2272261158
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Counselling Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- university students, student mental health, student well-being, student distress, student experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review