Cited by 5Climate Change Communication and PerceptionCounseling Practices and SupervisionPsychology and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Counselling psychology and climate change: A survey of the DCoP membership

Milton, Martin, Gimalova, Maya, Simmons, Beth·2020·Counselling Psychology Review

Abstract

Background: Climate change is a growing concern, a multi-dimensional, societal issue affecting our personal lives and the way we engage with clients. There is evidence that people are finding it a matter of anxiety and as such it is increasingly a focus in the therapeutic domain. In order to understand counselling psychology’s relationship to climate change, the Executive Committee of the British Psychological Society Division of Counselling Psychology (DCoP) initiated a working group on climate change in the latter part of 2019. This working group had several tasks including a statement about psychology and climate change, and the development of a reference library as a resource for those members who want to better understand the literature. The reference library is available at www.bps.org.uk/sites/www.bps.org.uk/files/Member%20Networks/Divisions/DCoP/Climate%20Change%20-%20Useful%20Reading.pdf . Methodology/methods: This consultation asked a sample of British counselling psychologists about their experience of research, clinical work and other engagement with climate change. Themes were identified. Results/findings: The findings indicate some variation as to what counselling psychologists think and do in relation to climate change; most respondents accepted that counselling psychologists need to be aware of the issue and be able to respond helpfully to clients who bring this focus; some colleagues are already working with this material and many wanted training; some are researching this phenomenon and wanted assistance in funding and disseminating relevant work; and counselling psychologists thought that the Division/wider BPS might usefully make a mission statement, library of resources and offer training.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53841/bpscpr.2020.35.2.57

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Adams, 2005, Ecopsychology and phenomenology, Existential Analysis: Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis, 16, 269
  2. Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Milton, M. (2015). The effects of pollution and population on the environment. In D.G. Nemeth & R. Hamilton (Eds.) Ecopsychology: Advances from the intersection of psychology and environmental protection. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Milton, M., Gimalova, M., & Simmons, B.
Affiliations
Regent's University London (GB)
Venue
Counselling Psychology Review
Published
2020-12
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
57-70
ISSN
  • 1757-2142 (ISSN-L)
  • 2396-8672
OpenAlex
W4316082787
Cited by
5
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Counselling Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
climate change, counseling psychology, climate anxiety, training needs, research funding, mission statements, reference library

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review