The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research
Abstract
Introduction The Intellectualization of Method Data-Oriented Methods Empiricist Techniques and Procedures Hermeneutics Interpretation and Insight Critical Theory The Political and Ideological Dimension Postmodernism and Postructuralism Destabilizing Subject and Text Language/Gender/Power Discourse Analysis, Feminism and Genealogy On Reflexive Interpretation The Play of Interpretive Levels
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315617444 · Cited by 12,703
Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis
Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/00380385030373002 · Cited by 1,391
Moltu, C., Stefansen, J., Svisdahl, M., & Veseth, M. (2012) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.656792 · Cited by 1,247
The limits of children’s voices: From authenticity to critical, reflexive representation
Spyrou, S. (2011) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568210387834 · Cited by 643
Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services
Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.002 · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Venue
- QMiP Bulletin
- Publisher
- British Psychological Society
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 101-103
- ISSN
- 2044-0820 (ISSN-L)
- 2396-9598
- OpenAlex
- W1492835342
- Cited by
- 3,463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1046.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.53841/bpsqmip.2012.1.14.101
- The paper
- Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. (2012). QMiP Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2012.1.14.101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
