Analysing the China Factor in the Indo-Pacific Strategy of the EU and India
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines how the China factor shapes the Indo-Pacific Strategy of the European Union (EU) and India, particularly in the post-Russia-Ukraine War. The EU and India share the common strategic interests of a free, open, inclusive, and rule-based maritime order in the Indo-Pacific region. India and the EU have acknowledged that China’s assertive stance and strategic ambitions present significant security concerns in the Indo-Pacific region. Recognising India’s strategic weight in the region, the EU intended to boost cooperation with India to build a robust maritime order, mitigating the disruptive and destabilising role of China. However, the unprovoked Russia–Ukraine War since 2022 has changed its strategic priorities and significantly altered its threat perception toward China. India’s long-standing ties with Russia contrast with the EU’s sanction-driven stance, necessitating nuanced approaches to bilateral and multilateral engagements. This paper maps the increasingly complex interactions between India and the EU in the Indo-Pacific as they navigate the multifaceted impacts of the Russia–Ukraine war. The paper explores how the Russia–China strategic partnership has intensified regional power struggles, compelling both India and the EU to reassess their policies toward Moscow. This study also analyses how India and the EU, each with its unique set of challenges and opportunities, can leverage their cooperation in the Indo-Pacific through stability, economic resilience, and sustainable security architecture amid escalating global geopolitical challenges. Keywords: Russia-Ukraine War, Indo-Pacific Strategy, China, EU, India, Geopolitics
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
- Authors
- Jeganaathan, J., & Sinha, S.
- Affiliations
- Jawaharlal Nehru University (IN)
- Dublin City University (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Sinha, Shreya
- Venue
- Journal of Contemporary Politics
- Publisher
- Bangalore University
- Published
- 2026-07-28
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 81-89
- ISSN
- 2583-6811 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7172307943
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Contemporary Politics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Maritime Security and History
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Political and Economic Relations
- Keywords
- Indo-Pacific strategy, China factor, EU-India relations, Russian invasion of Ukraine, maritime security, rules-based international order, Russia-China strategic partnership, Russia-India relations, regional power struggles, geopolitical competition, economic resilience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review