The Coalition against Police Abuse: CAPA’s Resistance Struggle in 1970s Los Angeles
Abstract
This article explores the Coalition Against Police Abuse (CAPA) and the resistance to police abuse in Los Angeles during the 1970s. It argues that the use of force directed at social movements by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) after the 1965 Watts uprising did not destroy resistance but rather provided the foundation for a new phase in the struggle against police violence. Evolving out of the repression of Black Power and Chicano movements, CAPA rejected the idea that the LAPD could be reformed from within. In order to fundamentally alter the relationship between residents and local criminal justice systems, CAPA demanded community control of the police. Activists worked to build a broad-based coalition to channel anger at police violence into an organized movement based on nonviolent protest, documentation of police abuse, redress through lawsuits, and political pressure in public hearings. By the 1980s, CAPA’s movement gained popular support from political officials, middle-class residents, church leaders, and civil rights organizations. This coalition, however, sought only minor changes at the margins of the criminal justice system that did not meaningfully alter the balance of power between the community and the police. Opposition to police abuse was consistent over time, but its ideological and political grounding narrowed as demands for accountability and justice were routed into established processes and institutions. Although the anti-police- abuse coalition…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Antipolice movements sowed the ground for unrest that erupted in response to the most extreme instances of police violence.
“Antipolice movements sowed the ground for unrest that erupted in response to the most extreme instances of police violence (Felker-Kantor 2016).”
From To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States (2024) · cites this paper as Felker-Kantor 2016
The abusive policing of the war on drugs and war on gangs set the context within which the 1992 uprising occurred.
“The abusive policing of the war on drugs and war on gangs set the context within which the 1992 uprising occurred (Felker-Kantor 2016;Felker-Kantor 2018b).”
From To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States (2024) · cites this paper as Felker-Kantor 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States
Felker-Kantor, M. (2024) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/732194 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Felker-Kantor, M.
- Affiliations
- Marian University - Indiana (US)
- Corresponding author
- Felker-Kantor, Max
- ORCID
- Felker-Kantor, Max
- Venue
- Journal of Civil and Human Rights
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Press
- Published
- 2016-04-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-88
- ISSN
- 2378-4245 (ISSN-L)
- 2378-4253
- OpenAlex
- W2465544041
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Civil and Human Rights (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
- Keywords
- Coalition Against Police Abuse, Los Angeles Police Department, police brutality, police accountability, Black Power, Chicano movement, nonviolent resistance, law and order politics, Los Angeles, 1970s, civil rights activism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review