“Detroit under STRESS”: The Campaign to Stop Police Killings and the Criminal State in Detroit
Abstract
During the early 1970s, a broad-based campaign comprising liberal and radical organizations emerged to confront the Detroit Police Department’s clandestine “Stop the Robberies, Enjoy Safe Streets” (STRESS) unit. The campaign to defeat STRESS drew from a diverse set of tactics; activists organized marches, demonstrations, and political education events and engaged in movement-based lawyering, public testimony, and electoral politics. As casualties of STRESS accumulated, Detroiters framed the unit as a killer squad with the primary purpose of terrorizing Black Detroiters. The STRESS killings during the early 1970s and the movement against them made Detroit a flashpoint for debate about race, crime policy, and effective policing, with far-reaching implications for both the police and the city. The campaign to defeat STRESS demonstrated the efficacy of Detroit’s Left during the early 1970s. The left wing of the movement, comprised of radical Black Power activists and white New Leftists, accomplished two overlapping goals. It not only helped build a vast coalition of organizations around the issue of police brutality but also, importantly, developed and articulated its own original analysis of radical criminology. Leftists critiqued the criminal state as the nexus between the state and private sector; these institutions swallowed resources and damaged lives. Challenging liberal theories of crime emphasizing individual agency, radicals advanced a structural analysis emphasizing rac…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Detroit STRESS unit targeted low-income Black neighborhoods for intensified policing following an infusion of federal law enforcement resources in response to the 1967 uprising.
“The STRESS unit targeted low-income Black neighborhoods for intensified policing following an infusion of federal law enforcement resources in response to the 1967 uprising.”
From To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States (2024) · cites this paper as McCoy 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- McCoy, A.
- Corresponding author
- McCoy, Austin
- ORCID
- McCoy, Austin
- Venue
- Journal of Civil and Human Rights
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Press
- Published
- 2021-04-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-34
- ISSN
- 2378-4245 (ISSN-L)
- 2378-4253
- OpenAlex
- W4210458505
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Civil and Human Rights (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- Detroit Police Department, police killings, police brutality, criminal state, radical criminology, Black Power, New Left, civil rights movement, political testimony, electoral politics, deindustrialization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review