Cited by 17Science Education and PedagogyIndigenous and Place-Based EducationCareer Development and Diversity

COSEE-AK Ocean Science Fairs: A Science Fair Model That Grounds Student Projects in Both Western Science and Traditional Native Knowledge

Dublin, Robin, Sigman, Marilyn, Anderson, Andrea, Barnhardt, Ray, Topkok, Sean Asiqluq·2014·Journal of Geoscience Education

Abstract

We have developed the traditional science fair format into an ocean science fair model that promoted the integration of Western science and Alaska Native traditional knowledge in student projects focused on the ocean, aquatic environments, and climate change. The typical science fair judging criteria for the validity and presentation of the science were expanded to include criteria for cultural and/or community relevance, and local and cultural experts were involved in judging. The Center for Ocean Sciences Education Excellence–Alaska (COSEE-AK) provided support for teachers to organize local and regional fairs and for student and chaperone travel to an ocean science “fair within a fair” at the Alaska statewide science and engineering fair. This approach engaged Alaska Native and rural students in science practice relevant to their cultures and communities and is being sustained by trained teachers and school districts. The results of interviews of 31 of 44 students participating in the 2013 COSEE-AK Ocean Science Fair at the state level suggest learner outcomes of (1) strong, positive feelings of self-efficacy in science; (2) comfort with being identified as a scientist; and (3) feelings of connection to the student's community and support in doing science projects. The ocean science fair can serve as a model for broadening diversity of participation in science by increasing the relevance of science to culture and communities in areas with ethnic groups and/or rural communit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5408/12-411.1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dublin et al. (2014) found that engaging Native students in science fair projects with guidance and support of teachers and curriculum specialists led to a significant improvement in their self-confidence in science.

    “The findings show that engaging Native students in science fair projects with the guidance and support of teachers and curriculum specialists led to a significant improvement in their self-confidence in science”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dublin, R., Sigman, M., Anderson, A., Barnhardt, R., & Topkok, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Center for Ocean Sciences Education Excellence–Alaska (COSEE-AK), 1009 West 3rd Avenue, Suite 100, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, USA
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
  • Sound View Evaluation and Research, 2837 Northeast 178th Street, Lake Forest Park, Washington 98155, USA
  • Alaska Native Knowledge Network, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 117 Bunnell, PO Box 756730, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA
Venue
Journal of Geoscience Education
Published
2014-05-28
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
166-176
ISSN
  • 1089-9995 (ISSN-L)
  • 2158-1428
OpenAlex
W2167622748
Cited by
17
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geoscience Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
climate change education, aquatic environment, rural students, Alaska Native students, science self-efficacy, underserved populations, student engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review