The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vivo Antifungal Activities of 57 Plant Extracts Against Six Plant Pathogenic Fungi
Open accessAbstract
Methanol extracts of fresh materials of 57 plants were screened for in vivo antifungal activity against Magna-porthe grisea, Corticium sasaki, Botrytis cinerea, Phyto-phthora infestans, Puccinia recondita, and Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. Among them, seven plant extracts showed disease-control efficacy of more than 90% against at least one of six plant diseases. None of the plant extracts was highly active against tomato gray mold. The methanol extracts of Chloranthus japonicus (roots) (CjR) and Paulownia coreana (stems) (PcS) displayed the highest antifungal activity; the CjR extract controlled the development of rice blast, rice sheath blight, and wheat leaf rust more than 90%, and tomato gray mold and tomato late blight more than 80%. The PcS extract displayed control values of more than 90 % against rice blast, wheat leaf rust, and barley powdery mildew and more than 80% against tomato gray mold. The extract of PcS also had a curative activity against rice sheath blight and that of CjR had a little curative activity against rice blast. On the other hand, the extract of Rumex acetocella roots reduced specifically the development of barley powdery mildew. Further studies on the characterization of antifungal substances in antifungal plant extracts are underway and their disease-control efficacy should be examined under greenhouse and field conditions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“| Chloranthus japonicas , Paulownia coreana | Roots, stem | Crude extract | rice blast, rice sheath blight, and wheat leaf rust”
From Efficacy of plant extracts in plant disease management (2012) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Efficacy of plant extracts in plant disease management
Gurjar, M. S., Ali, S., Akhtar, M., & Singh, K. S. (2012) · Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.4236/as.2012.33050 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, G.-J., Jang, K.-S., Kim, J.-S., Lee, S.-W., Cho, J.-Y., Cho, K.-Y., & Kim, J.-C.
- Venue
- The Plant Pathology Journal
- Publisher
- Korean Society of Plant Pathology
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 184-191
- ISSN
- 1598-2254 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W336965175
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- The Plant Pathology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
- Keywords
- plant extracts, antifungal activity, plant pathogenic fungi, Magnaporthe grisea, Botrytis cinerea, Phytophthora infestans, Puccinia recondita, Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei, Chloranthus japonicus, rice blast, rice sheath blight, leaf rust, barley powdery mildew, tomato gray mold, tomato late blight, curative activity, disease control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review