The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Take-all of Wheat and Natural Disease Suppression: A Review
Open accessAbstract
In agro-ecosystems worldwide, some of the most important and devastating diseases are caused by soil-borne necrotrophic fungal pathogens, against which crop plants generally lack genetic resistance. However, plants have evolved approaches to protect themselves against pathogens by stimulating and supporting specific groups of beneficial microorganisms that have the ability to protect either by direct inhibition of the pathogen or by inducing resistance mechanisms in the plant. One of the best examples of protection of plant roots by antagonistic microbes occurs in soils that are suppressive to take-all disease of wheat. Take-all, caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici, is the most economically important root disease of wheat worldwide. Take-all decline (TAD) is the spontaneous decline in incidence and severity of disease after a severe outbreak of take-all during continuous wheat or barley monoculture. TAD occurs worldwide, and in the United States and The Netherlands it results from a build-up of populations of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (2,4-DAPG)-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. during wheat monoculture. The antibiotic 2,4-DAPG has a broad spectrum of activity and is especially active against the take-all pathogen. Based on genotype analysis by repetitive sequence-based-PCR analysis and restriction fragment length polymorphism of phlD, a key 2,4-DAPG biosynthesis gene, at least 22 genotypes of 2,4-DAPG producing fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. have been described worldwide. In this review, we provide an overview of G. graminis var. tritici, the take-all disease, Pseudomonas biocontrol agents, and mechanism of disease suppression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fungal Resistance to Plant Antibiotics as a Mechanism of Pathogenesis
Morrissey, J. P., & Osbourn, A. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.3.708-724.1999 · Cited by 635
Cited by
When is it biological control? A framework of definitions, mechanisms, and classifications
Stenberg, J. A., Sundh, I., Becher, P. G., Björkman, C., Dubey, M., Egan, P. A., Friberg, H., Gil, J. F., Jensen, D. F., Jonsson, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Pest Science · doi:10.1007/s10340-021-01354-7 · Cited by 325
Crop rotational diversity increases disease suppressive capacity of soil microbiomes
Peralta, A. L., Sun, Y., McDaniel, M. D., & Lennon, J. T. (2018) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2235 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwak, Y.-S., & Weller, D. M.
- Venue
- The Plant Pathology Journal
- Publisher
- Korean Society of Plant Pathology
- Published
- 2013-06-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-135
- ISSN
- 1598-2254 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966248104
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Take-all of Wheat and Natural Disease Suppression: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5423/ppj.si.07.2012.0112
- The paper
- Kwak, Y.-S., & Weller, D. M. (2013). Take-all of Wheat and Natural Disease Suppression: A Review. The Plant Pathology Journal. https://doi.org/10.5423/ppj.si.07.2012.0112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.