The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compost and vermicompost as nursery pot components: effects on tomato plant growth and morphology
Open accessAbstract
Post transplant success after nursery stage is strongly influenced by plant morphology. Cultural practices strongly shape plant morphology, and substrate choice is one of the most determining factors. Peat is the most often used amendment in commercial potting substrates, involving the exploitation of non-renewable resources and the degradation of highly valuable peatland ecosystems and therefore alternative substrates are required. Here the feasibility of replacing peat by compost or vermicompost for the production of tomato plants in nurseries was investigated through the study of the effect of increasing proportions of these substrates (0%, 10%, 20%, 50%, 75% and 100%) in target plant growth and morphological features, indicators of adequate post-transplant growth and yield. Compost and vermicompost showed to be adequate substrates for tomato plant growth. Total replacement of peat by vermicompost was possible while doses of compost higher than 50% caused plant mortality. Low doses of compost (10 and 20%) and high doses of vermicompost produced significant increases in aerial and root biomass of the tomato plants. In addition these treatments improved significantly plant morphology (higher number of leaves and leaf area, and increased root volume and branching). The use of compost and vermicompost constitute an attractive alternative to the use of peat in plant nurseries due to the environmental benefits involved but also due to the observed improvement in plant quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
B IOCONTROL W ITHIN THE C ONTEXT OF S OIL M ICROBIAL C OMMUNITIES: A Substrate-Dependent Phenomenon
Hoitink, H., & Boehm, M. (1999) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.427 · Cited by 843
Effects of earthworm casts and compost on soil microbial activity and plant nutrient availability
Chaoui, H. I., Zibilske, L. M., & Ohno, T. (2003) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(02)00279-1 · Cited by 342
Cited by
Barrett, G. E., Alexander, P. D., Robinson, J. S., & Bragg, N. C. (2016) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.09.030 · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Lazcano, C., Arnold, J., Tato, A., Zaller, J. G., & Domínguez, J.
- Venue
- Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
- Publisher
- Editorial CSIC
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 944-951
- ISSN
- 1695-971X (ISSN-L)
- 2171-9292
- OpenAlex
- W2114213903
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compost and vermicompost as nursery pot components: effects on tomato plant growth and morphology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5424/sjar/2009074-1107
- The paper
- Lazcano, C., Arnold, J., Tato, A., Zaller, J. G., & Domínguez, J. (2009). Compost and vermicompost as nursery pot components: effects on tomato plant growth and morphology. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2009074-1107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.