Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 86African Education and PoliticsHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentEducation and Public Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improving Quality Higher Education in Nigeria: The Roles of Stakeholders

Open access
Asiyai, Romina Ifeoma·2014·International Journal of Higher Education

Abstract

This paper discusses the roles of stakeholders in improving quality of university education in Nigeria. Internal and external stakeholders are identified and the various roles they could play in improving the quality of university education are discussed. The paper contends that continuous and holistic improvement in university education system requires the collaborative efforts of various stakeholders both internal and external. Collaboration will help to trigger improvement in university education system. Such collaboration could be achieved through universities establishing a close link or relationship with employers of labour and other external stakeholders such other educational institutions, non-governmental organizations, private sectors. Universities can also collaborate with firms/industries by utilization of their technologies and expertise to influence improvement through staff training. Thus, quality can only be attained in university education through cost sharing among stakeholders such as government, universities and public/private sector. University administrators and university board management committee could ensure continuous improvement in university education system by ensuring constant training and retraining of teachers and other staff via professional development programmes of high quality. In this way, excellence and high standards is attainable in university education systems in the country.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p61

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Asiyai, R. I.
Affiliations
Delta State University (NG)
Corresponding author
Asiyai, Romina Ifeoma
Venue
International Journal of Higher Education
Publisher
Sciedu Press
Published
2014-12-11
Volume
4
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1927-6044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1927-6052
OpenAlex
W2154599952
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
20.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › African Education and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Public Policy
Keywords
higher education quality, stakeholder roles, university education, internal and external stakeholders, university-industry collaboration, employer partnerships, cost sharing, teacher professional development, employee training, university governance, Nigeria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.