The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Unbundled University: Researching emerging models in an unequal landscape. Preliminary findings from fieldwork in South Africa
Abstract
As Higher Education undergoes a massive expansion in demand globally, and experiences financial pressures exacerbated by the global financial crisis of 2008, the sector is evolving rapidly. Market pressures on the sector encourage the search for additional income and new forms of provision, and private providers are increasingly entering the sector. At the same time, the HE sector has seen the appearance of many flexible online courses and qualifications, delivered by new configurations of providers and partnerships, including by parties new to the sector, through a process of disaggregating educational provision into its component parts, or ‘unbundling’. Whilst these changes may offer opportunities for increased numbers of learners to access education and thus contribute to economic prosperity, there is very little empirical research about the nature, process and impact of this unbundling and rebundling of educational provision, as it is playing out in this rapidly reconfiguring space. This paper reports data on South African Higher Education from the research project ‘The Unbundled University: Researching emerging models in an unequal landscape’, a project which explores the terrain in both South Africa and the UK. South Africa is deemed the most unequal country in the world and its HE system is under pressure, demonstrated in part by rising fees, student protests and calls for decolonised education, whilst online education is viewed by some, including the South African Government, as a way to increase access. Using a new dataset systematically collected from the public domain, data visualisation is employed to bring a novel perspective to the educational provision being offered using digital technology (and the private companies partnering with universities in South Africa to provide it), to uncover patterns of activity and their relationship to existing patterns of inequality in the HE sector. Using mapping, or social cartography, this paper reveals patterns and relationships which are otherwise not so obvious. Significantly, the maps reveal relationships between universities and private companies which appear to reflect existing inequalities, insofar as private companies partner almost exclusively with historically advantaged, research intensive universities, with high international ranking and reputation. This paper argues that such partnerships do not disrupt an unequal terrain, but rather reflect and possibly reinforce the power asymmetries already at play.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The study revealed that irrespective of existing inequalities, but the use of e-learning for teaching and learning university courses is significantly the effective way to ensure relationships between universities and private sector.”
From Emergent transition from face-to-face to online learning in a South African University in the context of the Coronavirus pandemic (2020) · cites this paper as Swinnerton et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Bayne S, Jones C, de Laat M, Ryberg T & Sinclair C. (eds) (2014). Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Networked Learning 2014. ISBN: 978-1-86220-304-4
- Castillo, N.M., Lee, J., Zahra, F.T. & Wagner, D.A. (2015). MOOCs for Development: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities. Information Technologies & International Development. 11(2), 35-42.
- Craig, R. (2015). College Disrupted: The Great Unbundling of Higher Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Cranmer, S. J., Bonderup-Dohn, N., De Laat, M., Ryberg, T., & Sime, J. A (eds.). (2016). Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Networked Learning 2016: Looking back-moving forward. ISBN (electronic): 978-186220-324-2.
- Holmwood, John, (Ed). (2011). A Manifesto for the Public University. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
- Komljenovic, J & Robertson, L. (2016). The dynamics of 'market making' in higher education, Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 622-636.
- Liebman, M., & Paulston, R. G. (1994). Social cartography: A new methodology for comparative studies. Compare. 24(3), 233-245.
- Lynch, Kathleen. (2015). "Control by Numbers: New Managerialism and Ranking in Higher Education." Critical Studies in Education. 56 (2), 190-207.
- Marginson, S. (2013). The impossibility of capitalist markets in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(3), 353-370. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Networked Learning 2018, Edited by: Bajić, M, Dohn, NB, de Laat, M, Jandrić, P & Ryberg, T 226 ISBN 978-1-86220-337-2
- Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413-434.
- Olssen, M. and Peters, M.A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy. 20(3), 313-345.
- Readings, B. (1999). The University in Ruins. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
- Ruitenberg, C. W. (2007). Here be dragons: Exploring cartography in educational theory and research. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity & Education. 4(1), 7-24.
- Sharrock, G. (2015). Making sense of the MOOCs debate. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 37(5), 579-609.
- Stanley, D. (2006). Comparative dynamics: Healthy collectives and the pattern which connects. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity & Education. 3(1), 73-82.
- Thomas, J. and Cook, K. (2006). A visual analytics agenda. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 26(1), 10-13.
Cited by
Mpungose, C. B. (2020) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00603-x · Cited by 415
Metadata
- Authors
- Swinnerton, B., Ivancheva, M., Coop, T., Perrotta, C., Morris, N. P., Swartz, R., Czerniewicz, L., Cliff, A., & Walji, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning
- Publisher
- Aalborg University
- Published
- 2018-05-14
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 218-226
- ISSN
- 2794-7661
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Unbundled University: Researching emerging models in an unequal landscape. Preliminary findings from fieldwork in South Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.54337/nlc.v11.8758
- The paper
- Swinnerton, B., Ivancheva, M., Coop, T., Perrotta, C., Morris, N. P., Swartz, R., Czerniewicz, L., Cliff, A., & Walji, S. (2018). The Unbundled University: Researching emerging models in an unequal landscape. Preliminary findings from fieldwork in South Africa. Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning. https://doi.org/10.54337/nlc.v11.8758
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.

