The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blogs and Forums as Communication and Learning Tools in a MOOC
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents the findings of research carried out into the use of blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in Connectivism and Connective Knowledge (CCK08), a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) that was run between September and December 2008. The course was unique in many ways: it included a small credit-bearing course within a network; it was completely open and very large, and it included a unique aggregated network of blogs, which was one of the reasons why an unusually large number of online interactions took place in blogs rather than just in forums. The research used a survey and email interviews to explore a number of themes identified in the postings in the course which included: the importance of conceptual connections, personal connections, personal autonomy, media affordances and approaches to learning. The research identified three distinct clusters of respondents, with the following preferred modes of interaction: (1) blogging, (2) using the forums, (3) using both blogging and forums. A number of other modes of interaction were also used by the respondents. Many respondents used both blogs and forums for at least some of the time in the course.To a large extent, blogging and forum use correlated with specific individual learning styles and media affordances: the use of blogs was associated with the ability to create personal space for personal learning, quiet reflection and developing personal relationships with bloggers and others. The use of forums was associated with fast paced challenging interaction, relationships based on sharing of ideas, more open discussion and more links to the discussed themes and bigger picture. However, the research also identified three dimensions (home> <bazaar, long-loop> < short-loop, and engagement> < reflection) within which the new media provided different and new opportunities for participating in learning networks. Respondents used these to explore and develop their own affordances for learning in varied and even surprising and novel ways, sometimes using blogs or forums for particular purposes, but sometimes using them almost interchangeably. The research points to a maturing of media users in online learning. These users are developing their own personal learning networks, and using the new media in innovative and nuanced ways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170 · cited 1×
“…on Networked Learning 2010, Edited by: Dirckinck-Holmfeld L, Hodgson V, Jones C, de Laat M, McConnell D & Ryberg T 276 ISBN 978-1-86220-225-2 approach was used (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004), including a Survey Monkey questionnaire and email interviews, followed by further email ‘conversations’.”
Method
Cited by
MOOCs and the funnel of participation
Clow, D. (2013) · Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge · doi:10.1145/2460296.2460332 · Cited by 567
The Ideals and Reality of Participating in a MOOC
Mackness, J., Mak, S. F. J., & Williams, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning · doi:10.54337/nlc.v7.9190 · Cited by 437
Self-citationSemaan, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359175 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Mak, S. F. J., Williams, R., & Mackness, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning
- Publisher
- Aalborg University
- Published
- 2010-05-03
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 275-284
- ISSN
- 2794-7661 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W185138672
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blogs and Forums as Communication and Learning Tools in a MOOC. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.54337/nlc.v7.9191
- The paper
- Mak, S. F. J., Williams, R., & Mackness, J. (2010). Blogs and Forums as Communication and Learning Tools in a MOOC. Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning. https://doi.org/10.54337/nlc.v7.9191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.