Cited by 3Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringInternational Development and AidCommunity Development and Social Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Financial Planning Strategies on Financial Sustainability of NGOs in Nairobi County Kenya

Open access
Wanja, Jackline, Ronald, Martin Onsiro·2025·American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation

Abstract

With diminishing donor funding or its redirection to other pressing projects, humanitarian organizations are increasingly exploring commercial ventures to reduce their reliance on shrinking financial support. The primary focus of this study was to analyze the effect of financial planning strategies on financial sustainability of non-governmental organizations in Nairobi County, Kenya. The study employed a descriptive research design, drawing on theories such as Resource-Based theory. The study focused on a population of 201 NGOs that were fully registered with the NGO coordination board and located in Nairobi County. The primary data for this study will be collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Both qualitative and quantitative data was generated through the research process. Descriptive statistics, including absolute and relative percentages, frequencies, measures of central tendency, and dispersion (mean and standard deviation), will be employed. The findings were presented in tables and figures, with explanations provided in a narrative format. Furthermore, the study utilized Karl Pearson’s coefficient of correlation and multiple regression analyses to explore the relationships between the independent variables and the dependent variables, enhancing the depth of the research and contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing the performance of local NGOs in Kenya. Findings revealed moderate agreement on the effectiveness of financial practices but significant variability, indicating inconsistent implementation. Strong financial planning was positively correlated with improved performance, while donor fund management showed no significant relationship with organizational outcomes. These insights provided a comprehensive approach to enhancing financial sustainability and organizational effectiveness within the NGO sector.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.54536/ajebi.v4i1.3168

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Wanja, J., & Ronald, M. O.
Affiliations
Mount Kenya University (KE)
Venue
American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation
Publisher
E-palli
Published
2025-02-08
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
87-95
ISSN
  • 2831-5588 (ISSN-L)
  • 2832-4862
OpenAlex
W4407277114
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
Keywords
financial planning, financial sustainability, non-governmental organizations, resource-based view, NGO performance, Nairobi County

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review