Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 29Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesAntibiotic Use and ResistancePharmaceutical Economics and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A study of drug prescribing pattern using WHO prescribing indicators in the state of Goa, India

Open access
Chandelkar, Ulhas, Rataboli, Padmanabh·2014·International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Background: The quality of life in developing countries can be improved by enhancing the standards of medical treatment at all levels of the health care delivery system. Teaching hospitals have a special responsibility toward society to promote rational prescribing by their staff and, through them, the future generations of doctors.Methods: A sample of 1000 patient prescriptions was assessed retrospectively to assess the drug prescription patterns in the state of Goa.Results: Of 1842 drug products prescribed, the average number of drugs per prescription was 1.842. The total number of drugs prescribed by generic name was 1 (0.05%). An antibiotic was prescribed in 318 patient encounters (31.8%). Almost all drugs prescribed (n=1842, 99.67%) were on the essential drug list of India. During the study period, antibiotics were prescribed the most (n=318, 17.26%), followed by drug for cardiovascular system (n=265, 14.39%) and gastrointestinal tract (n=238, 12.92%).Conclusions: Baseline data gathered by this study can be used by researchers and policymakers. Further the problem-based basic training in pharmacotherapy; targeted continuing education can prove useful to medical profession to improve prescribing practice and public health administrators for promoting effective rational drug use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5455/2319-2003.ijbcp20141221

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Lianzhen C, Shujie W, Qing W, Limin S, Hailian W, et al. Field survey of international RDU indicators. China Pharm. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology | November-December 2014 | Vol 3 | Issue 6 Page 1061 Chandelkar UK et al. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Dec;3(6):1057-1061 2003;14(3):156-8.
  2. Bimo: Report on Nigerian field test. INRUD News 1992;3(1):9-10. In: How to Investigate Drug Use in Health Facilities. Geneva: WHO; 1993:74 (WHO/DAP/93.1).
  3. Bannenberg WJ, Forshaw CJ, Fresle D, Salami AO, Wahab HA. Evaluation of the Nile Province Essential Drug Project. Geneva: WHO; 1991. WHO/DAP/91.10. In: How to Investigate Drug Use in Health Facilities. Geneva: WHO; 1993:74 (WHO/DAP/93.1).
  4. Ministry of Health/Zimbabwe Essential Drugs Action Programme: essential Drugs Survey. In: How to Investigate Drug use in Health Facilities. Geneva: WHO; 1993:74 (WHO/DAP/93.1).
  5. Ofori-Adjei D. Report on Tanzanian field test. INRUD News; 3(1):9. In: How to Investigate Drug Use in Health Facilities. WHO: Geneva; 1993:74 (WHO/DAP/93.1).
  6. Christensen RF. A strategy for the improvement of prescribing and drug use in rural health facilities in Uganda. Ugandan Essential drugs and management program; 2 September-11 October 1990. In: How to Investigate Drug use in Health Facilities. Geneva: WHO; 1993:74 (WHO/ DAP/93.1).
  7. Bimo: Field testing of drug use indicators of INRUD: report of field trip to Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Nepal, June-July 1991. In: How to investigate drug use in health facilities. Geneva: WHO; 1993: 74 (WHO/DAP/93.1).

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chandelkar, U., & Rataboli, P.
Affiliations
Goa Medical College (IN)
Venue
International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Medip Academy
Published
2014
Pages
1057
ISSN
  • 2279-0780 (ISSN-L)
  • 2319-2003
OpenAlex
W2138123703
Cited by
29
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
prescribing patterns, WHO prescribing indicators, rational drug use, antibiotic prescribing, generic drug names, essential medicines, prescribing quality, teaching hospitals, Goa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.