Impact assessment of endocrine disruptors on sudden intrauterine and infant death syndromes
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The endocrine disruptors (EDs) are able to interfere with the endocrine \nsystem, mimicking or antagonizing the hormonal activity. They can persist in the environment, due to their \ndegradation resistance. The aim of our research has been to analyze the possible link between unexplained \nintrauterine and infant mortality and chronic exposure to EDs. Materials and Methods: We have investigated \n16 cases of sudden intrauterine unexplained death syndrome (SIUDS) and 8 cases of sudden infant death \nsyndrome (SIDS), collected over a 3-year period (2012-2014). Brain samples were submitted to chemical \nanalysis of 25 EDs, consisting in a liquid-solid extraction procedure, followed by a purification step and by a \ngas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. Results: The analytical method to detect the presence of \nEDs in brain samples has been successfully applied to SIUDS and SIDS victims. At the level of the brainstem, \nthe frequent association between the hypoplasia of the facial/parafacial complex and the hypoplasia of the \nraphe system has been ascertained. In particular, the hypo development of the parafacial nucleus, consisting \nof “pre-inspiratory” neurons with the main function of hierarchical modulation of breathing circuitry, appears \nan exclusive finding of unexplained stillbirths. Conclusions: The environmental EDs have been found able \nto cross the placental barrier, reaching also the brain nuclei assigned to the control of vita…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bisphenol A and its conjugated metabolites have been measured in multiple studies.
“Nevertheless, bisphenol A and its conjugated metabolites have been measured in multiple studies (Nahar et al., 2013, 2015; Pusiol et al., 2016; Anderson et al., 2012; Cao et al., 2012; Faulk et al., 2015; Mos covitz et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2011).”
From Pregnancy-related maternal physiological adaptations and fetal chemical exposure (2023) · cites this paper as Pusiol et al., 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pregnancy-related maternal physiological adaptations and fetal chemical exposure
Vinnars, M.-T., Bixo, M., & Damdimopoulou, P. (2023) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.mce.2023.112064 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pusiol, T., Lavezzi, A., Matturri, L., Termopoli, V., Cappiello, A., Piscioli, F., & Roncati, L.
- Venue
- European Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- ScopeMed
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 8
- ISSN
- 2148-5798 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2325408514
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutional Research information system (University of Urbino) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
- Keywords
- endocrine disruptors, sudden infant death syndrome, unexplained stillbirth, brainstem, raphe system, hypoplasia, placental transfer, chronic environmental exposure, developmental neurotoxicity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review