Cited by 5Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling Practices and SupervisionPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Delivering group CBT- competencies and group processes

Open access
Singh, Satwant·2014·Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research

Abstract

Cognitive Behavioural therapy (CBT) is an empirically validated psychotherapy and the most researched therapeutic modality t has shown to be effective in treating a range of psychological disorders. Group therapy a common and powerful modality of treatment is being increased in popularity due to its evidence base and cost effectiveness. CBT group treatment models have been adapted from the individual treatment models unlike traditional psychotherapy modalities that focus on the group process as a medium of change. Current training in CBT and the assessment of CBT competencies using validated measures do not focus on the development of the core competencies for group therapy facilitation as traditionally CBT has been offered as individual based therapy. These core competencies utilities the group processes to modulate change. There are similarities and differences between group therapy and CBT. The combination of group processes and the manulised CBT approach can add benefit to provision of group based CBT. There is a need for development of further training, development of a validated assessment tool on CBT group therapy and supervision for CBT therapist to skill therapist in provision of group therapy focussing on group processes as a medium of change. [JCBPR 2014; 3(3.000): 150-155]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5455/jcbpr.1670

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Beck AT, Freeman A (1990) Cognitive Therapy of Personality Disorders. New York: Guilford Press and Associates.
  2. Beck AT, Rush JA, Shaw BF et. al. (1979) Cognitive Therapy of Depression. New York: Guildford Press.
  3. Beiling PJ, McCabe RE, Antony MM (2006) Cognitive behavioural therapy in groups. New York: Guildford Press.
  4. Boyatzis RE (1982) The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  5. Brook DW (2008) Group therapy in M Galanter & HD Kieber (eds.) The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Substance Abuse Treatment. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
  6. Butler AC, Chapman JE, Forman EM et. al. (2006) The empirical status of cognitive-behavioural therapy: A review of metaanalyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26: 17-31.
  7. Clark DM, Wells A (1995) A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. Heimberg, M. Liebowitz, D.A. Hope & F.R. Schneier (Eds). Social Phobia: Diagnosis, assessment and treatment (pp. 69-93). New York: Guildford Press.
  8. Greif GL, Ephross PH (Eds) (2004) Group work with populations at risk (2nd ed,) New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Huntley AL, Araya R, Salisbury C (2012) Group psychological therapies for depression in the community: systemic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 200: 184-90.
  10. Huppert JD, Bufka LF, Barlow DH et. al. (2001) Therapists, therapist variables, and cognitive-behavioral therapy outcome in a multicenter trial for panic disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69: 747-55.
  11. Landy N, Hill CE, Corbett MM et. al. (1996) Nature, extend and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43: 10-24.
  12. McGlinchey JB, Dobson KS (2003) Treatment integrity concerns in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 17: 299-318. http://dxdoi. org/10.1891/jcop.17.4.299.52543 (winter). · DOI
  13. Milkulner M, Shaver PR (2007) Attachment, group related processes and psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 57: 233-45.
  14. Rose SD (2004) Cognitive-behavioural group work. In CD Garvin, LM Guitierrez, MJ Galinski (Eds.), Handbook of social work in groups (pp111-135). New York: Guildford Press.
  15. Yalom ID (1995) The theory and practice of group psychotherapy, (4th ed.). New York: Basics Books.
  16. Yalom ID, Leszcz M (2005) The theory of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
  17. Young JE (1999) Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Singh, S.
Affiliations
Newham University Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Singh, Satwant
Venue
Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research
Published
2014
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
150
ISSN
2146-9490 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034741541
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
group cognitive behavioral therapy, group process, therapist training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review