The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The history and status of general systems theory
Abstract
The article presents a history of general systems theory and discusses several of its various aspects. According to the author, the notion of general systems theory first stemmed from the pre-Socra...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Systems Theory offers a holistic perspective on the interrelations of organizational components, but lacks specific mechanisms to analyze operational dynamics, such as governance and decision-making, which are central to DAOs in DeSci.
“Systems Theory, for example, offers a holistic perspective on the interrelations of organizational components, but lacks specific mechanisms to analyze operational dynamics, such as governance and decision-making, which are central to DAOs in DeSci (Von Bertalanffy, 1972).”
From Adapting Mintzberg’s organizational theory to DeSci: the decentralized science pyramid framework (2024) · cites this paper as Von Bertalanffy, 1972
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 1,003
Metadata
- Authors
- Von Bertalanffy, L.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1972-12-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 407-426
- ISSN
- 0001-4273
- 1948-0989
- Cited by
- 1,003
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
