Cited by 479Psychometric Methodologies and TestingSurvey Methodology and NonresponseJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Social Desirability Response Bias in Self-Report Choice Situations

Arnold, H. J., Feldman, D. C.·1981·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

The susceptibility to social desirability response bias of four alternative methods of measuring the importance of job and organizational characteristics is examined. Data were collected from 86 gr...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/255848

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 9 · Cited by 479

Authors
Arnold, H. J., & Feldman, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
1981-06-01
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
377-385
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2094603337
Cited by
479
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
social desirability bias, self-report, choice situations, job characteristics, organizational characteristics, measurement methods, job importance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review