Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Implications of Servant Leadership for Leaders

Xu, Haoying, Wang, Zhen·2018·Academy of Management Proceedings

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a surge of scholarly interest in servant leadership, resulting in substantial evidence of its beneficial effects for employees, group and organizational outcomes. Despite the impressive progress researchers made over these years, the implications of servant leadership for leaders still remains largely unknown. This study attempts to address this issue by looking into the questions related to what consequences servant leadership brings to leaders, how the process unfolds, and when the influence is more likely to occur. Adopting conservation of resources theory as overarching framework and using multilevel, multisource, multistage data collected from a sample of 89 supervisors and 536 employees, we found that servant leadership was beneficial for leaders'workplace (i.e., task performance, job satisfaction) and work-family interface (i.e., work-to-family conflict, work-to-family enrichment) outcomes through leaders reducing their resource loss (operationalized by emotional exhaustion) and generating psychological resources in terms of positive affect, work meaningfulness, and need satisfaction. Moreover, our results revealed boundary conditions for the resource generating mechanisms. Specifically, the positive effects of servant leadership on positive affect, work meaningfulness, and need satisfaction were less salient when leaders' perceived organizational support was high. Key words: Servant leadership, COR theory, resource loss, resource generation…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/ambpp.2018.17337abstract

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Xu, H., & Wang, Z.
Venue
Academy of Management Proceedings
Published
2018-08
Volume
2018
Issue
1
Pages
17337
ISSN
  • 0065-0668
  • 2151-6561
Cited by
2
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implications of Servant Leadership for Leaders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/ambpp.2018.17337abstract
The paper
Xu, H., & Wang, Z. (2018). Implications of Servant Leadership for Leaders. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.17337abstract