Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Psychological Contracts in Algorithmic Management

Tomprou, Maria, Lee, Min Kyung·2019·Academy of Management Proceedings

Abstract

Algorithmic management makes decisions that humans used to make, changing the employee-employer relationship. A new discipline is emerging to explain whether and how algorithms impact people’s lives in organizations, online platforms, education, and healthcare, among other areas. This paper seeks to contribute to this effort by addressing the question of how algorithmic management influences the employment relationship using a psychological contract perspective. We develop propositions to explicate the mechanisms behind how algorithmic management affects employee psychological contract. Our propositions are built upon two dimensions: (1) the role of the algorithm, such as consistency in decisions and outcomes, constrained social interactions and the level of algorithmic intervention in the psychological contract; and (2) human-centered design features, such as algorithmic fairness, transparency, and participatory involvement that may promote one’s psychological contract. We discuss how these design features will relate to the psychological contract through the mechanisms of perceived justice, sensemaking, and empowerment. We conclude with empirical recommendations and practical implications to encourage research in this direction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/ambpp.2019.12894abstract

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Tomprou, M., & Lee, M. K.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon U.
Venue
Academy of Management Proceedings
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
2019
Issue
1
Pages
12894
ISSN
  • 0065-0668
  • 2151-6561
Cited by
4
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review