The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thriving on the knowledge of outsiders: Tapping organizational social capital
Open accessAbstract
Executive Overview Organizations are operating in increasingly complex worlds that require them to apply large amounts of knowledge to their activities. Because knowledge is continuously changing and evolving, most organizations cannot possess all required knowledge within their formal boundaries. Accordingly, they need to acquire large amounts of knowledge from outside the organization by tapping their linkages to external organizations and individuals. A variety of methods can be used to access knowledge that lies outside the organization's boundaries. Such methods vary from tapping the social networks of executives to more involved efforts such as alliances. The method used must be appropriate to the volume and kind of knowledge needed. However, benefiting from the knowledge of outsiders has several additional complexities, and executives need to prepare their organizations to take advantage of social capital. For instance, they need to ensure that the organization has an adequate level of knowledge in the areas to which it is importing knowledge so that it can understand and effectively use the new knowledge. They also need to ensure that they possess some unique proprietary knowledge within their boundaries. Additionally, as organizations develop their relationships with external entities, they need to continuously monitor the quality of knowledge derived from such sources; there is always the danger of such relationships becoming a liability without the organization being aware of it. This article details the various ways through which such pitfalls may be avoided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Cited by
Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445 · Cited by 3,864
Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations
Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/ame.2004.13837437 · Cited by 709
Self-citationReychav, I., & Te’eni, D. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.009 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Anand, V., Glick, W. H., & Manz, C. C.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Perspectives
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-101
- ISSN
- 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4529
- OpenAlex
- W2156770322
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thriving on the knowledge of outsiders: Tapping organizational social capital. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/ame.2002.6640198
- The paper
- Anand, V., Glick, W. H., & Manz, C. C. (2002). Thriving on the knowledge of outsiders: Tapping organizational social capital. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.6640198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.