The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination
Abstract
Executive Overview In a connected world, remote groups at the fringe of a firm's current operations can find common cause, exerting increasing pressure and calling into question the firm's legitimacy and right to operate—witness the recent debacles involving Monsanto, Shell, and Nike. Moreover, the knowledge needed to generate competitive imagination and to manage disruptive change increasingly lies outside the organization, at the periphery of firms' established stakeholder networks. Unfortunately, most companies still tend to focus management attention only on known, salient, or powerful actors to protect their advantages in existing businesses. In recognition of these challenges, we develop the concept of Radical Transactiveness (RT). RT is a dynamic capability which seeks to systematically identify, explore, and integrate the views of stakeholders on the “fringe”—the poor, weak, isolated, non-legitimate, and even non-human—for the express purpose of managing disruptive change and building imagination about future competitive business models. RT consists of two complementary skills. First, by reversing the logic of traditional approaches focused on managing powerful stakeholders, firms fan out to identify voices at the fringe of their networks to both preempt their concerns and generate imaginative new business ideas. Second, by creating mechanisms for complex interaction and empathy with those on the fringe, firms fan in to integrate and reconcile this knowledge with existing know-how to design and execute disruptive new business strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The long‐term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices
Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, N., & Bansal, P. (2016) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2410 · Cited by 1,260
Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400227 · Cited by 861
Hall, J., & Wagner, M. (2012) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.728 · Cited by 227
Dreyer, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., Hamann, R., & Faccer, K. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.036 · Cited by 201
Tian, Q., Liu, Y., & Fan, J. (2015) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2015.14 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Perspectives
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-18
- ISSN
- 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4529
- OpenAlex
- W2178462359
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 73.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/ame.2004.12691227
- The paper
- Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.12691227
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.